Steve,,
The article explains $ 8,000,000, but where is the other $ 12,000,000 coming from.
Even $ 8,000,000 is staggering.
By making the club and not each member responsible is an indication that the membership did NOT support the clubhouse project, but the BOG wanted to go ahead despite the lack of member support and obligation.
Both factions have no one to blame but themselves.
I would assume the property is zoned for single family homes, but with the waterways running through the property, I don't see how they can come up with a high number of home sites.
At 8 or 20 million of debt the banks are going to take a bath if they sell it for development or to a party interested in maintaining the golf club.
And, the longer they hold onto it, the more the value as a club deteriorates, and the longer the Federal government will hammer them for holding a non-performing asset and/or bad loan
A lot of very smart guys made a lot of stupid mistakes, but the words of the great "H" told to me when I was 22, ring true.
"I don't care how smart they are or how successful they are, the moment the front wheels of their cars pass through the front gate, they turn into idiots."
Truer words were never spoken at Woodcrest