[quote author=Bart Bradley link=topic=54759.msg1265892#msg1265892 date=1360114714
Jason:
Thank you. But a (admittedly crappy) search of the site reveals only a few mentions...no pictures, no threads, no analysis.
One would think that the world's most comprehensive website devoted to Golf Course Architecture would have lots of information about the 24th best public access course in the US.
Any pictures?
Bart
[/quote]
Bart - I did a thread describing my favorite holes but I can't find it and the links went bad for the photos and diagrams I pulled from the club website. The best I can offer you is an aerial photo tour which does not highlight the significant elevation changes on the property.
http://course.bluegolf.com/bluegolf/course/course/classicmaddens/aerial.htmI think the course is under-discussed because:
1. It has an 80's-90's big appearance to it and was built shortly before Sand Hills and the subsequent minamilist type courses popular here.
2. While it is a terrific destination for a 3 hour drive the area does not contain any name courses that many are going to take a flight to see. Giant's Ridge carries the advantage of having a terrific Donald Ross course in an amazing setting (Northland) that easily fits into a long weekend trip.
3. The course is tough. Eight of the holes have water carries and a few others have water in play. People can rack up a number on an off day. Nonetheless, my best score as an adult came on this course so it can be had on a good day.
4. The course takes quite a bit of repeat play to really understand because there are a lot of slopes that can help you and a bunch of other slopes that can kill you.
5. It was designed by the superintendent (Scott Hoffman) with assistance from John Harris, a former US Am champ and senior tour player. Thus, no one has heard of the architect.
6. They flipped the nines a few years after opening. The original opening holes were relatively benign - a very short par five (now 10), a short par 4 (now 11) and then a 190 yard par three without water hazards (now 12). By contrast the opening holes now are intimidating - a par five with an awkward downhill layup that is a terrific hole but difficult to decipher the first time around; a par three with water short right and a terrific short cape par 4 where the back half of the green slopes to water behind. The holes are perfect for the midpoint in the round but intimidating as a start. (I understand pace of play picked up by 1/2 hour after they flipped the nines. I have no idea why).
7. While the course is very walkable, most people ride and cart paths are pretty jarring.