News:

This discussion group is best enjoyed using Google Chrome, Firefox or Safari.


Ben Sims

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: What place does cyberbullying have on GCA.com?
« Reply #100 on: February 05, 2013, 09:53:57 AM »
I'm not a huge Harry Potter fan, but I have found that dealing with He-who-shall-not-be-named is rather easy when you learn how to defeat him. 

1). Understand that he has hidden his soul in nuggets of factoids all over the world.  Catch him in a weak position on one of those, and you can kill one of those "horcrux."  A good example would be reminding him that Notre Dame's competitiveness against Bama was as real as Teo's girlfriend. 

2). Resort to stupid tactics.  Usually I hate using someone's own techniques against them, but I've found that you can both confuse and enrage He-who-shall-not-be-named by running him out of colors.  You see, Ran has blessed us with 14 colors on this discussion board.  If Shivas would have started using all the colors of the rainbow early in his intellectual and rewarding college football debate, he could have saved tons of bandwidth for Ran. 

3). Remind him that the rich white guys lost the election....again.

4).  Or, you could do like many have learned to do.  Avoid him when you don't care about the topic.  Or you could try ignoring him when you are posting on the topic that has earned his ire.  This incessant bitching about the man is getting very old, just like him.  The judge that commisioned me told me as I left for the academy, "Never get mad at people for being who they are.  You should know what they are and understand that they're always going to be that way.  Work in that construct." 

Craig Van Egmond

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: What place does cyberbullying have on GCA.com?
« Reply #101 on: February 05, 2013, 10:18:29 AM »
Rare is the person who can weigh the faults of others without putting his thumb on the scales.

What we all tend to complain about most in other people are those things we don’t like about ourselves. – William Wharton

How much easier it is to be critical than to be correct. – Benjamin Disraeli

Other people’s faults are like bees – if we don’t see them, they don’t harm us. – Luis Vigil
« Last Edit: February 05, 2013, 10:20:38 AM by Craig Van Egmond »

Michael Dugger

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: What place does cyberbullying have on GCA.com?
« Reply #102 on: February 05, 2013, 11:34:09 AM »
Some people are merely obsessed with being "right" at all costs.

And some of those types hang around here.

You simply have pity on them, and ignore.

There is much more going on with life than to get dragged down by such nonsense.

In your case, William, shooting low scores at Bandon Trails.

Pat Mucci was that 11 yr old kid who would come over to your house and tell you in no uncertain terms that you were playing with your toys incorrectly. 

G.I. Joe action figures cannot be played with at the same time as Star Wars action figures.

I stopped inviting those kids over for slumber parties and went on my merry way.

You should too... 

 
What does it matter if the poor player can putt all the way from tee to green, provided that he has to zigzag so frequently that he takes six or seven putts to reach it?     --Alistair Mackenzie--

J_ Crisham

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: What place does cyberbullying have on GCA.com?
« Reply #103 on: February 05, 2013, 11:47:46 AM »
GCA needs to rid thererself of Patrick Mucci... a viler person you could not find.

Until he is gone GCA is not something I want to b part of.

The site is desperate for a moderator. Bullys need to be eradicated.
Huh? You can't be serious regarding Pat being vile? He may challenge your view or pull your chain but it's not life or death.  I have played golf and thrown down a few cocktails with Pat and he is very much the enjoyable gentleman to spend a day with- he is very well versed in golf and the architecture side of things. Your view would probably be different if you spent some time golfing with him.

Bill_McBride

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: What place does cyberbullying have on GCA.com?
« Reply #104 on: February 05, 2013, 01:14:38 PM »
GCA needs to rid thererself of Patrick Mucci... a viler person you could not find.

Until he is gone GCA is not something I want to b part of.

The site is desperate for a moderator. Bullys need to be eradicated.
Huh? You can't be serious regarding Pat being vile? He may challenge your view or pull your chain but it's not life or death.  I have played golf and thrown down a few cocktails with Pat and he is very much the enjoyable gentleman to spend a day with- he is very well versed in golf and the architecture side of things. Your view would probably be different if you spent some time golfing with him.

Jack, I don't think he's ever been to a King's Putter, Dixie Cup, Thaw-Out, Midwest Mashie or Buda Cup.   Too bad.  I did meet him at Yale and the next day at The creek Club during a charity event.  I think he's missing out skipping all the other events.   He could bully guys face to face!   ;D

Bryan Izatt

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: What place does cyberbullying have on GCA.com?
« Reply #105 on: February 05, 2013, 01:46:19 PM »
Jack,

That's part of the problem.  Most here have not met him or golfed with him and consequently form opinions based on his internet persona.  It seems he's a Jekyll and Hyde character.  The online Hyde is not very nice even though the offline Jekyll may be an "enjoyable gentleman" as you say.  Evidently he doesn't care and perhaps even enjoys being a troll online.


-------------------------------------------------


To the rest, one way to deal with him is to not feed the troll.  If you don't enter into debate with him he has no one to lash out against.




And, for your amusement, this looks like a pretty good representation of Patrick's online persona.


« Last Edit: February 05, 2013, 01:55:30 PM by Bryan Izatt »

Gib_Papazian

Re: What place does cyberbullying have on GCA.com?
« Reply #106 on: February 05, 2013, 01:48:10 PM »
I made a quick headcount and it appears this lovefest lynch mob are heavy to Kiwis, Ockers, Limeys and Porridge Wogs. This would include the sententious Mr. Collar (A. Stiff), whose high-handed animus and censorious ultimatums go far beyond bullying. I do not recall my friend Patrick ever having the arrogance or temerity to order someone "eradicated" and thrown out of the Treehouse.

It seems odd that nobody but me ever calls Anthony Butler out; did Patrick ever assert a position on global warming? Anthony's vacant prattle reads like a liberal anthropoid throwing smug, accusatory shit from a safe corner of his cage. Patrick is just as entitled to his opinions as anybody else here. BTW, Obama *is* a reckless spendthrift, although I do not recall Patrick taking a position on that.

Far beyond our petty squabbles about how many squares of toilet paper Mackenzie used in the john at Cypress Point or the silly pie fights about Merion is the importance of keeping real life in perspective. In the grander scheme of things, all we are doing here is playing ping pong about an arcane and nearly irrelevant subject.

"In any dispute the intensity of feeling is inversely proportional to the value of the issues at stake."
- Charles Philip Issawi

I will tell you one other thing, so put down your pitchforks and torches and listen up. Before you start greasing up the rope, don't forget that in REAL LIFE, the three smartest guys in the room are Mucci, Shivas and Uncle Bob. As a matter of fact, if I ever got the jing together to build Redan Hills with Neal, those three are the organizational core of my club.

J_ Crisham

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: What place does cyberbullying have on GCA.com?
« Reply #107 on: February 05, 2013, 02:01:35 PM »
GCA needs to rid thererself of Patrick Mucci... a viler person you could not find.

Until he is gone GCA is not something I want to b part of.

The site is desperate for a moderator. Bullys need to be eradicated.
Huh? You can't be serious regarding Pat being vile? He may challenge your view or pull your chain but it's not life or death.  I have played golf and thrown down a few cocktails with Pat and he is very much the enjoyable gentleman to spend a day with- he is very well versed in golf and the architecture side of things. Your view would probably be different if you spent some time golfing with him.

Jack, I don't think he's ever been to a King's Putter, Dixie Cup, Thaw-Out, Midwest Mashie or Buda Cup.   Too bad.  I did meet him at Yale and the next day at The creek Club during a charity event.  I think he's missing out skipping all the other events.   He could bully guys face to face!   ;D
Bill, I agree that it's a shame you won't see Pat or Tom Paul at some GCA events- the brief time I have spent with both of these guys was a hoot. TEP was a throwback to a different era in both golf and America. Just a terrific host and prolific storyteller. My guess is that  if more guys had a chance to play a round and share some cocktails the sniping would be minimized. After getting drummed by you at The KIng's Putter a few years back at MPCC's Shore course I can assure you I will not be a wiseass!Wish you well, Jack

Don_Mahaffey

Re: What place does cyberbullying have on GCA.com?
« Reply #108 on: February 05, 2013, 02:07:55 PM »
Something about sitting in front of a keyboard, or behind the steering wheel, brings out the worst in people.
And I've certainly been guilty of giving grandma the finger for not getting out of my way, but I'm not proud of that, and I wish i hadn't done it. I guess that makes me some sort of pathetic whiner, but in retrospect it really wasn't worth getting so worked up.

I think the same goes here, and that comes from someone who has spewed plenty of venom over the years. I look back on some of the things I've written, some of the names I've called people, and wish I hadn't done it as it served zero purpose and did absolutely no good whatsoever. I forgive myself as I'm only human, but also have tried to control the hate that seems so ready to creep back in.

What Patrick chooses to do is up to him. He obviously has enough friends and backers here to make sure he has an ally in any fight. Maybe one of these days one of those friends will give him the same advice they seem so willing to give to those he chooses to rant on, but probably not. One thing for sure, we can chase down the guy who flips us off and try to beat his ass, or we can wish him a good day and some peace.

Chris Johnston

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: What place does cyberbullying have on GCA.com?
« Reply #109 on: February 05, 2013, 02:12:50 PM »
jmo - I think we have gone far enough with this thread and I think my friend Ran would be wise to dispose of it.

Trashing a person we have never met is like trashing a course we've never seen.  There are several colors here on GCA, some light and some dark.  Some of the dark is funny, if not flailingly so.  Making things personal is not cool, neither is the attack and retribution.

An experience: Mahaffey was pretty tough on me when I first arrived.  Now, I consider him one of my best friends.  Food for thought.

GCA should be open to all of reasonable cheer, character, and conduct.  Where any of these may be breached, it is up to our fearless leader to tend to his garden in the manner he wishes.  I have faith in him.

Lets talk about architecture, courses, and the game we love.  And, of course, fun.


Bill_McBride

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: What place does cyberbullying have on GCA.com?
« Reply #110 on: February 05, 2013, 02:40:57 PM »
GCA needs to rid thererself of Patrick Mucci... a viler person you could not find.

Until he is gone GCA is not something I want to b part of.

The site is desperate for a moderator. Bullys need to be eradicated.
Huh? You can't be serious regarding Pat being vile? He may challenge your view or pull your chain but it's not life or death.  I have played golf and thrown down a few cocktails with Pat and he is very much the enjoyable gentleman to spend a day with- he is very well versed in golf and the architecture side of things. Your view would probably be different if you spent some time golfing with him.

Jack, I don't think he's ever been to a King's Putter, Dixie Cup, Thaw-Out, Midwest Mashie or Buda Cup.   Too bad.  I did meet him at Yale and the next day at The creek Club during a charity event.  I think he's missing out skipping all the other events.   He could bully guys face to face!   ;D
Bill, I agree that it's a shame you won't see Pat or Tom Paul at some GCA events- the brief time I have spent with both of these guys was a hoot. TEP was a throwback to a different era in both golf and America. Just a terrific host and prolific storyteller. My guess is that  if more guys had a chance to play a round and share some cocktails the sniping would be minimized. After getting drummed by you at The KIng's Putter a few years back at MPCC's Shore course I can assure you I will not be a wiseass!Wish you well, Jack

Thanks Jack.  I've been searching fruitlessly for that swing ever since!

RJ_Daley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: What place does cyberbullying have on GCA.com?
« Reply #111 on: February 05, 2013, 02:56:31 PM »
Agreeing with the wise fellows, Chris and Don, and as a participant in this forum for many years, I think it is fair to say we are reaching the "Serenity Prayer" portion of this annual purge of pent-up winter, non-golf season group therapy session.  We have some form of it every year, and often serveral times a year.  We all should know a few simple things by now.  We engage and express and opine, even about others style and motives, because we CHOSE TO.   No one need respond or engage in something that appears wrong, unfair, or boorish that is said and done, unless we want others to have what we ourselves narcisistically deem the 'benefit' of our own observations and beliefs.  And, as an offender myself, I'll say sorry to those who take offense, and have at me to those that wish to engage, rebutt, point out my shortcomings of thoughts or deeds, and I will for one decide if I've had enough, or will continue the debate, discussion, or food fight.  Those offended, should avert their eyes, and I say this with all due respect, for I'm just a participant and observer of our treehouse behavior for many years now.  

Sure, guys marvel at how different some on-forum persona are from real life meet-ups.  After all, it is unlikely we would meet anywhere else than a venue of golf where we have common passion, and mutual respects.  I doubt most of us debatants will be meeting each other at our own political party caucuses, socialist workers of the world, Fox news editorial board mid winter clambake, MSNBC pub crawl, or Tax payer alliance convo.  So, if something jerks your chain that is commented on, just use your common sense and wit to make your point, offer a link or two to support your thoughts-if it is a complicated subject, and move on.  Those that agree and disagree with either cheerleading you or tell you what a dolt you are, do so because they can and should if they are so motivated.  But, don't get into it, if you can't take it.  And disengage if it becomes too insulting or too much to bear another person's indescret personal invective vituperation.  Have faith that we aren't the dumbest lot to inhabit a cyberspace forum.  (I'm rather proud actually of the quality of knowlegeable people on this forum in many diverse subjects...that they will engage with me at all, argue or agree, even when we get far afield from the actual GCA topic).  Have faith that if discourse is taken in an uncivil direction, that the rest of the forum are smart enough to separate the valid and meritorious from the cheap and invalid tact that may sometimes be taken.  It is all fine, if you just put it in context and perspective.  

Dr. Katz is greatly missed... and this sort of group therapy session should not be guided by just any rank amatuer.   ::) ;) ;D 8)
No actual golf rounds were ruined or delayed, nor golf rules broken, in the taking of any photographs that may be displayed by the above forum user.

Anthony Butler

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: What place does cyberbullying have on GCA.com?
« Reply #112 on: February 05, 2013, 03:33:56 PM »
I made a quick headcount and it appears this lovefest lynch mob are heavy to Kiwis, Ockers, Limeys and Porridge Wogs. This would include the sententious Mr. Collar (A. Stiff), whose high-handed animus and censorious ultimatums go far beyond bullying. I do not recall my friend Patrick ever having the arrogance or temerity to order someone "eradicated" and thrown out of the Treehouse.

It seems odd that nobody but me ever calls Anthony Butler out; did Patrick ever assert a position on global warming? Anthony's vacant prattle reads like a liberal anthropoid throwing smug, accusatory shit from a safe corner of his cage. Patrick is just as entitled to his opinions as anybody else here. BTW, Obama *is* a reckless spendthrift, although I do not recall Patrick taking a position on that.

Far beyond our petty squabbles about how many squares of toilet paper Mackenzie used in the john at Cypress Point or the silly pie fights about Merion is the importance of keeping real life in perspective. In the grander scheme of things, all we are doing here is playing ping pong about an arcane and nearly irrelevant subject.

"In any dispute the intensity of feeling is inversely proportional to the value of the issues at stake."
- Charles Philip Issawi

I will tell you one other thing, so put down your pitchforks and torches and listen up. Before you start greasing up the rope, don't forget that in REAL LIFE, the three smartest guys in the room are Mucci, Shivas and Uncle Bob. As a matter of fact, if I ever got the jing together to build Redan Hills with Neal, those three are the organizational core of my club.


Gib,

Having a couple of kindergarten and below-aged children, I understand the desire to constantly attract attention even when it is negative attention... that's why I often ignore their juvenile antics and the messages you send me through the board...

That said, I do have a hard time believing you misconstrued my original post that badly... my point was some of Pat's vehemently defended, yet ultimately indefensible positions reminded me of the opinion pages of a certain publication that is placed next to my 'porridge' of a morning... To that point,  I have a hard time believing even he thinks that Donald Trump represents a long-term benefit to the game of golf, it's simply a contrarian viewpoint that enables him to attract negative attention when he throws it out here.

As to the three people you nominated as the top IQs on this particular board... unless we've accepted the act of pointless provocation as a sign of intellectual superiority, I highly doubt that is true either.   
Next!

Gib_Papazian

Re: What place does cyberbullying have on GCA.com?
« Reply #113 on: February 05, 2013, 05:08:36 PM »
The assertion that a particular position is "indefensible" is an opinion. If Patrick thinks Donald Trump is good for the game and you disagree, all that means is that Anthony Butler takes a contrary position - based on his OPINION.

What makes you so sure your views are correct and Pat's thoughts are wrong? Will wisdom and perspective die with you? Just because I think you're a complete wanker - and would rather clean Obama's chamber pot than play golf with you - does not mean I believe Anthony Butler ought to be "eradicated."

I would no more boot you off this board than remove the punching bag from my gym, but I repeat myself.

As for those three guys I mentioned, all have been a source of great inspiration to me and I value their opinions and friendship. You should be so lucky.

And if the WSJ puts you off your tea, I suggest the NY Times Editorial Page. There, you will find smug, jack-booted lock-steppers like yourself, who take every opportunity to sneer at Rush Limbaugh and generally advance the cause of creeping totalitarianism in America.

I think you're washing out the wrong orifice with vinegar and baking soda.      

« Last Edit: February 05, 2013, 05:16:17 PM by Gib Papazian »

Chris Johnston

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: What place does cyberbullying have on GCA.com?
« Reply #114 on: February 05, 2013, 05:21:54 PM »
RJ...

This Serenity Prayer?

Courtesy of the USNavy Seals:

"God grant me the courage to change the things I cannot accept;
the serenity to accept the things I cannot change;
the strength to bury the bodies of those I was forced to kill;
and the wisdom to avoid stepping on toes which may be connected to asses I may have to kiss tomorrow."







J_ Crisham

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: What place does cyberbullying have on GCA.com?
« Reply #115 on: February 05, 2013, 05:23:46 PM »
The assertion that a particular position is "indefensible" is an opinion. If Patrick thinks Donald Trump is good for the game and you disagree, all that means is that Anthony Butler takes a contrary position - based on his OPINION.

What makes you so sure your views are correct and Pat's thoughts are wrong? Will wisdom and perspective die with you? Just because I think you're a complete wanker - and would rather clean Obama's chamber pot than play golf with you - does not mean I believe Anthony Butler ought to be "eradicated."

I would no more boot you off this board than remove the punching bag from my gym, but I repeat myself.

As for those three guys I mentioned, all have been a source of great inspiration to me and I value their opinions and friendship. You should be so lucky.

And if the WSJ puts you off your tea, I suggest the NY Times Editorial Page. There, you will find smug, jack-booted lock-steppers like yourself, who take every opportunity to sneer at Rush Limbaugh and generally advance the cause of creeping totalitarianism in America.

I think you're washing out the wrong orifice with vinegar and baking soda.      


Geez I thought William F. Buckley died ;)

Peter Pallotta

Re: What place does cyberbullying have on GCA.com?
« Reply #116 on: February 05, 2013, 05:32:38 PM »
Aside from my one attempt at humour, I've stayed out of this - I have no strong feelings about the issue, and have never met any of the posters.  But as the tone turns darker and more accusatory, I'd like to note that there is a big difference between bluster and bullying, between condescension and contempt, and between disagreement and dis-inpowerment (sp).  Some posters many times, and many posters some times, couch their disagreements in bluster and condescension; but I don't think I've seen many example of bullying or contempt in a long time. My two cents: best to wrap this up, eh?
« Last Edit: February 05, 2013, 05:37:00 PM by PPallotta »

Anthony Butler

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: What place does cyberbullying have on GCA.com?
« Reply #117 on: February 05, 2013, 05:54:04 PM »
The assertion that a particular position is "indefensible" is an opinion. If Patrick thinks Donald Trump is good for the game and you disagree, all that means is that Anthony Butler takes a contrary position - based on his OPINION.

What makes you so sure your views are correct and Pat's thoughts are wrong? Will wisdom and perspective die with you? Just because I think you're a complete wanker - and would rather clean Obama's chamber pot than play golf with you - does not mean I believe Anthony Butler ought to be "eradicated."

I would no more boot you off this board than remove the punching bag from my gym, but I repeat myself.

As for those three guys I mentioned, all have been a source of great inspiration to me and I value their opinions and friendship. You should be so lucky.

And if the WSJ puts you off your tea, I suggest the NY Times Editorial Page. There, you will find smug, jack-booted lock-steppers like yourself, who take every opportunity to sneer at Rush Limbaugh and generally advance the cause of creeping totalitarianism in America.

I think you're washing out the wrong orifice with vinegar and baking soda.      


Geez I thought William F. Buckley died ;)
He did. This is simply the rotting corpse you're smelling.

BTW... what camp do you put Ross Douthat and David Brooks in? Even William F. Buckley sized up Brooks for a pair of jack-boots and decided they didn't fit...
Next!

SL_Solow

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: What place does cyberbullying have on GCA.com?
« Reply #118 on: February 05, 2013, 06:40:07 PM »
This is a thread that won't die.  But it should.  Perhaps it is because I engage in argument for a living or maybe its because I have friends from all across the political spectrum but I don't come here to find people who agree with me on matters political or architectural.  It would be awfully boring if we all agreed with each other and I learn more from people with different experiences and different points of view.  While I prefer nuanced and thoughtful discussion, when people feel strongly about topics, they may forget their manners.  Alternatively, they may be trying to get under the skin of the opposition to gain an advantage in the argument.  Either way, the best tactic is to ignore the distraction and focus on the substance.  Nobody ever caught a fish that refused to take the bait. The only thing that I have heard of here that rises to the level of bullying is when individuals have taken their disputes away from the board and made them personal or spoken to employers.  That is out of bounds.

For those who question my sincerity, I consider Pat, Shivas, Gib, RJ, Sir Robert and many others my friends and have met many of them in person.  Those who know me understand that politically I am in the center left so it would be difficult to suggest that I line up with the so called "villains".  I would also respectfully suggest that if one looks past some of the more provocative statements which are often OT, there is a lot of wisdom and experience emanating from those with whom you disagree.  Learn from the valuable, filter out or giggle at whatever you deem to be the rest.  Don't take this board, the opposition, or yourself too seriously.  For most of us, this board is part of life's toy department.
« Last Edit: February 05, 2013, 06:43:05 PM by SL_Solow »

JLahrman

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: What place does cyberbullying have on GCA.com?
« Reply #119 on: February 05, 2013, 06:52:40 PM »
This is a thread that won't die.  But it should.  Perhaps it is because I engage in argument for a living or maybe its because I have friends from all across the political spectrum but I don't come here to find people who agree with me on matters political or architectural.  It would be awfully boring if we all agreed with each other and I learn more from people with different experiences and different points of view.  While I prefer nuanced and thoughtful discussion, when people feel strongly about topics, they may forget their manners.  Alternatively, they may be trying to get under the skin of the opposition to gain an advantage in the argument.  Either way, the best tactic is to ignore the distraction and focus on the substance.  Nobody ever caught a fish that refused to take the bait. The only thing that I have heard of here that rises to the level of bullying is when individuals have taken their disputes away from the board and made them personal or spoken to employers.  That is out of bounds.

For those who question my sincerity, I consider Pat, Shivas, Gib, RJ, Sir Robert and many others my friends and have met many of them in person.  Those who know me understand that politically I am in the center left so it would be difficult to suggest that I line up with the so called "villains".  I would also respectfully suggest that if one looks past some of the more provocative statements which are often OT, there is a lot of wisdom and experience emanating from those with whom you disagree.  Learn from the valuable, filter out or giggle at whatever you deem to be the rest.  Don't take this board, the opposition, or yourself too seriously.  For most of us, this board is part of life's toy department.

Generally agree...but the fact that this thread has reached five pages with many posters contributing, with the focus of the discussion being around the language and decorum being used on this website, indicates that people are not just imagining a lack of civility on the board.

Sticks and stones may break my bones...but why should we even have to pull out those words of wisdom on such a regular basis anymore? I don't consider it bullying, but I do wonder why the manners are so poor. This is an online forum. We shouldn't have to meet people in person for evidence that someone isn't a jerk.
« Last Edit: February 05, 2013, 06:54:31 PM by JLahrman »

Gib_Papazian

Re: What place does cyberbullying have on GCA.com?
« Reply #120 on: February 05, 2013, 06:55:55 PM »
Shelly,

I agree, the primary purpose of this board is amusement and some intellectual gymnastics.

Anybody who suggests someone ought to be "eradicated" from the Treehouse is missing the point of the Treehouse.

As stated above, I would never suggest that Anthony Butler be booted from the realm.

Besides, we need him - in case Ran is grading on the curve.  ;)  

J_ Crisham

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: What place does cyberbullying have on GCA.com?
« Reply #121 on: February 05, 2013, 06:59:54 PM »
Gib,  Is it true that you wrote the script for The Firing Line?
                        JK Galbraith

Don_Mahaffey

Re: What place does cyberbullying have on GCA.com?
« Reply #122 on: February 05, 2013, 07:04:38 PM »
Eradication is definitely out of line. But none stop put downs and insults all in the name of good fun, no problem. Hell, they can just leave if they don't like it.

Sam Morrow

Re: What place does cyberbullying have on GCA.com?
« Reply #123 on: February 05, 2013, 07:42:03 PM »
Looking at this I think the bang on Mucci stuff is wrong and ironic. People are bullying the alleged bully. This is disappointing coming from adults.

I've never met Pat Mucci, I look at him as the eccentric uncle. I by no means agree with everything he says but that doesn't make him a bully. I've seen people who have tried to borderline bully people on this site and it's wrong. Yes Mucci comes off as a 1% who only plays the best in the northeast but let's be realistic here, he's not a bully. I just wonder if anyone calling him out would be willing to ask for his phone number, call him and actually speak about your issues with him.

David Kelly

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: What place does cyberbullying have on GCA.com?
« Reply #124 on: February 05, 2013, 08:07:58 PM »
Nobody ever caught a fish that refused to take the bait.
Shelly,

Some people like to go spearfishing.
"Whatever in creation exists without my knowledge exists without my consent." - Judge Holden, Blood Meridian.

Tags:
Tags:

An Error Has Occurred!

Call to undefined function theme_linktree()
Back