I'll take a crack at this. I have better recollection of the Red course; I played it twice, but was only able to play the Blue course 1.5 times.
1 - Red
2 - Blue
3 - Blue
4 - Blue (liked both very much)
5 - Blue
6 - Red
7 - Red
8 - No Decision
9 - Red
10 - Red
11 - Blue
12 - Red
13 - Red (liked both)
14 - Red
15 - Blue
16 - Blue
17 - Red
18 - Blue
This is a fun exercise. Seeing golf holes once, especially when playing a match, is just not enough for look around. In addition, these are complex golf courses, best appreciated by repeat plays with different pin positions. I was quite dehydrated by the second day, and was just hanging on the last couple of days. A few specific remarks:
#15 Red may be the longest par 4 I've ever played. I like many things about it, especially the green, but I felt the inevitable layup to play for bogey was very tough, and the long uphill walk at that point in the round made it pretty demoralizing. The relatively straightforward Blue hole wins by a nose.
#16 Red vs. #16 Blue is a close call. #16 Blue is very jarring to my eye, in a "I don't think I have that shot" way. Actually, both of these holes strongly favor a fade, which I can usually execute for a few weeks in late summer.
I like most everything about #7 Blue, especially the various tees and angles it can be played, but I am unconvinced the disruptive walk onto the island and back to #8 tee is worth it. From the 190 tees, a long and demanding tee shot.
I'd like to hear an explanation for the center bunker on #8 Blue. Maybe my winter golf ability makes it seem overly penal.
Overall, the courses seemed very difficult, with especially demanding tee shots to get into scoring position. This probably means I'm driving it poorly, and the architects understand how well many players drive it these days.