Mike Vegis:
I agree with your take ... tournaments should not be decided for the convenience of golf writers, or even spectators. *
But, don't you have a lot of places on site where you could put people up?
* Also, since corporations are people, I don't think the event should be decided for the convenience of corporate sponsors, either. But, if it's really all about money, then what is the point of this thread anyway?
Tom, it's only about money. Case in point was the 2001 Ryder Cup, moved to 2002 because of the September 11, 2001 events.
Previous Ryder Cups around wartimes were not played altogether (see WWII years). I understand the Cups were played during the years the United States was involved in Vietnam, so I can't speak to this.
The Ryder Cup, from the late 1920s, was played in odd-numbered years. Moving forward, it is played in even-numbered years. How nice to break with tradition for a few bucks. I don't recall the exact reasons given by the PGA for postponing rather than cancelling, but I remember feeling that the excuses were rather weak at best, and it was a purely money thing.
I'm sure the PGA Tour had a hand in the decision as well, heaven forbid the Presidents Cup be cancelled for a year.
The USGA does what they can to make it seem less all about the money, even though their television commercials are so patronizing it's sick.
The PGA seems to unabashedly declare it's only about the money.
When can we go back to Valhalla?