I love the spin and speculation on this website when it comes to Castle Stuart. To summarize, we've been told that Paul Lawrie couldn't possibly actually mean what he said about the course, and even if he did mean it he has only won a single British Open so why should we care? As for Lee Westwood, he is skipping the Scottish Open because knows he is better off playing real "links golf" somewhere else in preparation for the Open.
Reportedly Westwood injured his groin and knee last Saturday in France and is taking the week off so as to allow the minor injuries to heal prior to the Open. But let me guess . . . . those posting here know better just as they know to ignore Lawrie's praise. Is the "injury" just a ruse to mask the real reason Westwood is not playing? Does he want to avoid Castle Stuart prior to the Open at all costs? Did he purposefully go into his tailspin at the French Open after the supposed "injuries" to better sell his lame excuse for skipping the Scottish so he could hide out somewhere more suited for Open preparation?
By the way, was that why Westwood spent all those years past playing the Scottish Open at Loch Lomond the week before the Open? Did Loch Lomond prepare him for the links conditions he would face the next week in the Open? Give me a break . . .
I agree with Tom Kelly. I don't really care what the pros shoot if they are playing interesting golf shots, and last year they seemed to be.
____________________________________________________________
Tom Kelly,
I don't have any pictures but from what has been reported it doesn't sound like the changes have been too major. Four new bunkers and a few new tees adding 150 yards to the course. That and some invisible drainage changes.
The reported cost is interesting . . . I've read the cost of the changes was $110,000 but I assume that figure was supposed to be pounds. Either way, in the era of millions of dollars being spent on drainage issues and "improvements" to courses, that figure strikes me as almost reasonable.