Paul:
If you wouldn't mind, how would you rank the following Chicago area public courses (assuming you've played them):
Ravisloe
Harborside (either one)
Big Run
Bolingbrook
Prairie Landing
Cog #4
Cog #2
Ruffled Feathers
Orchard Valley
Highlands of Elgin
Thunderhawk
Pine Meadow
Glen Ellyn
Cantigny
The Glen Club
Shepherd's Crook
Second question, what features or values influence your ranking?
Third question, if Ravisloe was kept in "country club" conditions, would it rank higher?
If you offered to pay, and buy me lunch, I would play Cog #4, The Glen Club, and Pine Meadows.
I guess that's the difference between the two of us, if you paid I'd play any of them (even without the free lunch).
Can't fault you for having your own standards, but my guess is that you're a bit more critical than most of the folks on this board. I get the life is too short argument, but I think we probably don't align on what we would consider a bad golf course.
Still interested in hearing exactly what is important to you in analyzing a golf course. From the sounds of it, it comes down to conditioning, difficulty (including length) and the inclusion of interesting holes. Of those three, I consider the first two overrated and the third the key factor.
I certainly don't agree with you that Rav only has a couple of interesting holes. Off the top of my head, the 2nd, 4th, 8th, 9th, 11th, 12th, 13th, 15th, 16th and 17th jump out as holes that are not only interesting, but provide a diverse range of shots and playing characteristics. Its worth playing the course once just to experience the 8th, which is a great lesson using bunkers to challenge the ideal line to the green.