I thought his comment about the land being different than Bandon Dunes because it was 60-70 feet above the coast was an odd one. He said that Bandon Dunes was much closer or something to that effect, which I took to mean he was implying the cliffs were lower. I would have estimated the Bandon Dunes cliffs to be 50-100 feet above the beach. Am I that far off? Maybe I missed the point he was trying to make.