Ted:
I would never keep score against other architects. I only keep score for how we did with the pieces of property we've been given. We're doing pretty well on that count. [Also, just as a reminder, my personal top ten list is still subject to change.]
John Shimp:
I have never believed that the only important courses are tournament courses -- in fact, the example of tournament courses have generally been a bad thing as far as how they've impacted golf course architecture over the years, as there is too much of a focus on difficulty. I've tried to show how unnecessary that is, with limited success.
I would agree with you that we haven't built a lot of "important" courses -- though judging from the pictures I see of others' work, Pacific Dunes has had an impact on what others are building now. Probably the biggest impact my recent work has had is that more architects are becoming more involved in shaping the courses they build, as Bill Coore and I both learned to do from Mr. Dye.
I think the Olympic bid process showed that the PGA Tour is not interested in having me design tournament courses, so I may never have a chance to do an "important" course by your own silly definition. I'd have loved to show all the naysayers what I could have done, but for me personally, tournament golf is not really what golf is about.