News:

This discussion group is best enjoyed using Google Chrome, Firefox or Safari.


John Kavanaugh

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: The Back Nine
« Reply #25 on: April 10, 2012, 11:47:55 AM »
Is it me or were the trees the savior of the tournament this year?

Phil Benedict

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: The Back Nine
« Reply #26 on: April 10, 2012, 11:52:59 AM »
It seems like there are a number of hard driving holes on the back 9 - 10, 11, 17 and 18 caused trouble for the pros.

Will MacEwen

Re: The Back Nine
« Reply #27 on: April 10, 2012, 12:06:32 PM »
Is it me or were there more balls in the trees on 18 than I ever remember before? Especially the first 3 days?

Seemed to be lots of balls in the right trees.  I saw very few in the left fw bunker.

I don't mind 18 as a finisher.  We have seen players bogey it and lose (Len Mattiace, Norman), and birdie it to win.  Mickelson, O'Meara and Schwartzel (off the top of my head) all needed a 3 to win and got it done. 

Patrick_Mucci

Re: The Back Nine
« Reply #28 on: April 10, 2012, 03:25:53 PM »
As trees mature, they get bigger and intrude further into the corridors of play.

When you factor in the added length, which was achieved vis a vis chute like corridors, it's easy to see why more balls find themselves amongst the trees.

Some of those tee shots from the back tee are frightening.

Jim Johnson

Re: The Second Nine
« Reply #29 on: April 10, 2012, 03:33:06 PM »
Subject title changed for Steve Shaffer.  :)

Steve_ Shaffer

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: The Second Nine
« Reply #30 on: April 11, 2012, 12:05:45 PM »
Jim,

On behalf of the Membership Committee of ANGC and our Chairman Billy Payne, we thank you.  ;D
"Some of us worship in churches, some in synagogues, some on golf courses ... "  Adlai Stevenson
Hyman Roth to Michael Corleone: "We're bigger than US Steel."
Ben Hogan “The most important shot in golf is the next one”

Tags:
Tags:

An Error Has Occurred!

Call to undefined function theme_linktree()
Back