We should not be judging the merits of the entirety of the golf course. What we can do is make some observations. i don't think it's ridiculous for us to make comments about the routing from thousands of miles away so long as we acknowledge that we do not know about the topography and acknowledge that what we don't know if the proposed decisions were feasible.
That being said, from what I can see I like the look of the individual holes, but the "Future Development" zones are suspect, and I wonder if the best land for the golf course is really being used. For example, the walk from 9 to 10 has a "Future Development" zone right in between. It's not much of a walk around the building, but if their first priority was the golf course, would they really put homes in this location? Why not put a path that bypasses the clubhouse and utilizes the natural aspects of the landscape?