If the sex appeal/flat-hat image is the main grain of sand in our collective shells, then Cobra/Puma may be even guiltier. I thought that their footprint at the PGA Show was far larger and more grating than Back 9's.
Like it or not, there is a large-scale effort underway to bring golf to younger generations. And as much as I dislike the look, the flat-brim, bright-color scheme is attractive to a lot of people. What I take a bit of umbrage with is that there is an assumption that people who like that look (and, therefore, things like Back 9 and Cobra/Puma) are going to destroy the genteel nature and notions of etiquette of the game. I don't think making that jump is very helpful, to be honest.
If this large-scale marketing effort does bring more players to the game, everyone will benefit. Even those who would rather exclude new players than accept a new strategy.
Why would "everyone" benefit?
Golf has always had a certain core base passed on generation to generation and new players have slowly found their way to the game via caddie programs, golf in school programs, clinics at public and private courses, First Tee etc.
Golf is a slow game that doesn't appeal to many types, BUT HAS GREAT APPEAL TO MANY OTHERS from all walks of life.
I'm just not sure why we need a bunch of clowns to make it cool, all so they can go do next cool thing once they find out it has great challenge, and it takes a lot more than coolness to obtain the skill and patience to play the game.
Are we (or any new golfer) better off joining the rappers and being really cool, or are the newer golfers(or the rappers ) better off embracing a culture of self discipline, self control, self respect, and personal improvement.
Let's lift people through golf out of the ghetto, not sink golf to the ghetto.