News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Anthony Gray

What would CBM change about NGLA after seeing Old Mac?
« on: January 16, 2012, 04:47:58 PM »

  ?

  Anthony


jeffwarne

  • Karma: +0/-0
"Let's slow the damned greens down a bit, not take the character out of them." Tom Doak
"Take their focus off the grass and put it squarely on interesting golf." Don Mahaffey

Joey Chase

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: What would CBM change about NGLA after seeing Old Mac?
« Reply #2 on: January 16, 2012, 04:53:19 PM »
Nothing I hope!!!

Patrick_Mucci

Re: What would CBM change about NGLA after seeing Old Mac?
« Reply #3 on: January 16, 2012, 08:28:54 PM »
The people who are allowed to post on GCA.com  ;D

PThomas

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: What would CBM change about NGLA after seeing Old Mac?
« Reply #4 on: January 16, 2012, 08:35:29 PM »
not a damn F*%$ing thing (and that's probably the type of language he'd use)
199 played, only Augusta National left to play!

Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +3/-1
Re: What would CBM change about NGLA after seeing Old Mac?
« Reply #5 on: January 16, 2012, 09:45:06 PM »
He would change the grass types to fescue, for sure.  [Of course, he probably planted fescue at National in the first place, and they've just gone away from it since.]

And he might knock some of the straight edges out of his design, too.  I really don't think he chose deliberately to build his features in a rectilinear style ... I think he just did it that way because he didn't have construction guys who knew any better.

Ben Sims

  • Karma: +1/-0
Re: What would CBM change about NGLA after seeing Old Mac?
« Reply #6 on: January 17, 2012, 12:51:52 AM »
I really don't think he chose deliberately to build his features in a rectilinear style ... I think he just did it that way because he didn't have construction guys who knew any better.

Interesting thought.  I consider the single greatest weakness of the house of Macdonald (Raynor and Banks too) to be the "rectilinear style." Honestly, I've never really thought about why their work looks the way it does from the standpoint of your quote above.  I have always assumed that it was because straight lines would be the simplest way to define the playing characteristics of templates and further differentiate MacRaynobanks in the golf boom of the 1910-1930 period. 

Tom, would you agree that Macdonald and Raynor's attention to shot values (or variation of shots required for their courses) combined with MacKenzie's aesthetics to be the "ultimate architect?"

Anthony Gray

Re: What would CBM change about NGLA after seeing Old Mac?
« Reply #7 on: January 17, 2012, 08:01:12 AM »
He would change the grass types to fescue, for sure.  [Of course, he probably planted fescue at National in the first place, and they've just gone away from it since.]

And he might knock some of the straight edges out of his design, too.  I really don't think he chose deliberately to build his features in a rectilinear style ... I think he just did it that way because he didn't have construction guys who knew any better.

  How about the tee box on 2? Would he move it to the right and foward a little? I like the angles at OM better.

   Anthony


Jeff Taylor

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: What would CBM change about NGLA after seeing Old Mac?
« Reply #8 on: January 17, 2012, 01:22:51 PM »
The angle on #2 @ NGLA is what makes the hole. Having hit from down there on the right, I can attest to the importance of precision off the tee.

Michael George

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: What would CBM change about NGLA after seeing Old Mac?
« Reply #9 on: January 17, 2012, 01:30:40 PM »
The people who are allowed to post on GCA.com  ;D

That is funny!

I am sure with his nature and considering the story concerning his relative that he took out of his will after offering advice about #1 at NGLA, Mr. Macdonald would not have appreciated any of us amateurs posting on the site.  I certainly would be out.

I don't know what MacDonald would have changed to NGLA, but as he took the best of many great courses that he played, I am sure that he would take parts of Old Macdonald if he designed other courses.  From what I have read of him, I could see him loving #7.
"First come my wife and children.  Next comes my profession--the law. Finally, and never as a life in itself, comes golf" - Bob Jones

Dan Kelly

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: What would CBM change about NGLA after seeing Old Mac?
« Reply #10 on: January 17, 2012, 02:09:22 PM »
Apropos of ... nothing, perhaps:

During my noontime constitutional through the skyways over the frozen streets of St. Paul, I read Malcolm Gladwell's take on Steve Jobs: "The Tweaker," at http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/11/14/111114fa_fact_gladwell?currentPage=all. I confidently say that it's worth your time, if you haven't read it.

And then I saw this thread, and I thought: Were Macdonald and Jobs brothers in spirit?

Discuss, if you'd care to.

You could also discuss this: In the (formerly) great big world of golf-course architecture, who were/are the Visionaries and who were/are the Tweakers?
"There's no money in doing less." -- Joe Hancock, 11/25/2010
"Rankings are silly and subjective..." -- Tom Doak, 3/12/2016

Patrick_Mucci

Re: What would CBM change about NGLA after seeing Old Mac?
« Reply #11 on: January 17, 2012, 05:22:18 PM »
He would change the grass types to fescue, for sure.  [Of course, he probably planted fescue at National in the first place, and they've just gone away from it since.]

And he might knock some of the straight edges out of his design, too.  I really don't think he chose deliberately to build his features in a rectilinear style ... I think he just did it that way because he didn't have construction guys who knew any better.

Tom,

He tinkered/fine tuned it over the next few decades.
If he thought something was wrong I'm sure he would have corrected it over that span of time.

Which begs the question.

What will you tinker/fine tune over the next few decades ?


Michael George

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: What would CBM change about NGLA after seeing Old Mac?
« Reply #12 on: January 17, 2012, 05:30:43 PM »
He would change the grass types to fescue, for sure.  [Of course, he probably planted fescue at National in the first place, and they've just gone away from it since.]

And he might knock some of the straight edges out of his design, too.  I really don't think he chose deliberately to build his features in a rectilinear style ... I think he just did it that way because he didn't have construction guys who knew any better.

Tom,

He tinkered/fine tuned it over the next few decades.
If he thought something was wrong I'm sure he would have corrected it over that span of time.

Which begs the question.

What will you tinker/fine tune over the next few decades ?


Patrick - if you get this answered, you really are a YaBB God!!!

"First come my wife and children.  Next comes my profession--the law. Finally, and never as a life in itself, comes golf" - Bob Jones

Jim_Kennedy

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: What would CBM change about NGLA after seeing Old Mac?
« Reply #13 on: January 17, 2012, 06:28:28 PM »
Anthony,
It's been 100+ years since NGLA was created and since that time there has been something like 15k more courses built in the USA. NGLA sits in the top 10 best courses in the US, and the only course built in the modern era that ranks (GD, GM) slightly higher (one place) is Sandhills.

Why would he want to change anything?   

"I never beat a well man in my life" - Harry Vardon