Other than being restored to its' original design, can someone explain to me why this version is better than the one in Robert's picture?
Not trying to stir the pot, just curious.
I realize the pictures were shot from different distances so that could be contributing to my ignorance
[/quote]
Not to hijack the thread.. but since you asked I'll do my best to explain why I think its a better hole now that it has been restored to its original design.
Here are two photos of the hole as it was before restoration. One from the ground and also an aerial view.
Tillinghast wrote that: "It is the thought of some that the one shot hole needs only to provide a teeing-ground and a green with immediately surrounding hazards. But as a matter of fact the approach is of incalcuable value when it is constructed to lend finesse to the play."
The old version of the 18th was exactly this, a one shot hole with immediately surrounding hazards... it did not require "finesse to the play" and did not really provide options of attack. The fully restored version requires the player to consider many options to find the best way home. He can play the hole three or four different ways:
1. "The raking shot home" as Tillinghast called it.
2. "The careful two-to-the-green" from short right of the right side bunker.
3. "a kick to the green from a pulled shot into the throw on the extreme left of the fairway."
The options of attack are in my mind what makes the restored hoe a much better hole than the previous version. Check out Chapter 40 called "The Reef Hole" of "The Course Beautiful" for the full text.
[/quote]
Brian,
Thank you for the well thought out informed response.
I assume the new picture illustrates more of a fairway option left and short of the green, as well as more fairway right.
The older aeriel has the fairway as more as of island in the rough (I assume eliminating runup)
I realize this is a restoration, but the bunker in the left foreground seems really big.
Do you not think Tillinghast could've accomplished the same intent with something a bit smaller/subtle?
Agreed Brora has a great closer