News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Matthew Mollica

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: The National (Old) - Cape Schanck, Australia
« Reply #25 on: December 17, 2011, 10:09:57 PM »
The 17th tee (originally the 12th) was the point at which the "we simply must put golf holes on that land" discussion was had between members of the National Golf Holdings board in the 1990's. Looking out across Cups Country, once owned by pastoralists (the Stewart family), this stretch is now home to the Moonah and Ocean courses at The National.



Easy to see the motivation. Undulating, sparsly vegetated sandy land, acted upon by good winds, on the edge of the coast and the National Park. 700 odd hectares was purchased for a little more than $3.5mil. Seems like more and more of a steal as each year goes by.

MM
"The truth about golf courses has a slightly different expression for every golfer. Which of them, one might ask, is without the most definitive convictions concerning the merits or deficiencies of the links he plays over? Freedom of criticism is one of the last privileges he is likely to forgo."

Matthew Mollica

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: The National (Old) - Cape Schanck, Australia
« Reply #26 on: December 17, 2011, 10:17:20 PM »
#17, Par 5, 491m, Index 16.

A downhill dogleg left with the last portion of fairway and green veering back to the right. This par 5 is another shot swinger. A wide fairway awaits, bunkered on it's inside (left) with an additional bunker further right serving as a sighter for those not flirting with the corner.



The hole sweeps downhill and to the left, and sits beautifully on the land. Northerly winds and westerly winds literally implore one to open the shoulders, and carry the sand on the inside elbow of the fairway. Carrying the vegetated hill into which the bunkers are cut, comes more and more into play the stronger the aiding breezes and the more courageous (or hopeful) the golfer on the tee. The fairway beyond this hill is blind, and asks for a greater carry the further left one aims. The puzzle consists of knowing one's ability, and also executing to one's ability, after factoring wind, carry and fairway orrientation, not to mention the intimidation presented by the vegetation on the rise. And the blind fairway. Hard to tire of a course when it presents equations such as these repeatedly through the round, especially when it also provides ample visible fairway into which conservative play may be alternatively made. Risk-free play, or strong southerly winds see the hole play as a three shot proposition.

Trajectory control on the drive is important with hurting winds, an exposed tee site, and the elevation difference from tee to fairway. With over 230m to go, it's a matter of plotting a course to the pin as you see fit. Fairway food /wedge? Hybrid and longer third? Maybe mid iron mid iron to some pins for some players? Modes of play on 17 vary significantly among many groups. Various segments of the green are best approached from distinctly different portions of fairway. Heroic drives bring the green well within reach for the second shot. Such an approach is under 200m and looks like this.



A string of bunkers starts out along the right side of the fairway and meander diagonally to the line of play, sitting through the zone of comfortable sand wedge approach. This gives everyone something to think about on their second or third shot. The space between some of the bunkers is decepitvely large, a point often only appreciated by some as they walk by.

I've always found this green hard to accurately visualise from the fairway. Short iron and wedge approaches are played uphill slightly, and the green front bunker complex dominates the view. As hard as I wrestle on approach, I've never got a good visual lock on the precise shape and dimensions of much of the front right of this green. I expect this is an intended design feature - if so, it's well done, and makes one really sweat on where to leave their second shot, and how best to approach.



The green features a back right portion of deceptive speed, a delightful little lobe left (with accompanying bunker), and a front right portion characterised by a dominant ridge. Again, putting from one green portion to the next can be scary, and yet an absolute blast, with all manner of angles considered and creative approaches taken to the task. When pinned, the back left portion is a hoot to play, as it demands accuracy on approach, and yields putts of marked speed and break.



Some of the greenside bunkering here is reminiscent of what we love about the best bunkering on the Sandbelt - formal edges adjacent to the putting surface, blending seamlessly with the native vegetation, to an ill-defined edge at their rear, while preserving playability and function.
 

The 17th on National (Old) is another roller coaster of a hole - where score spread can be sizeable. As is the case with so many holes on the layout, the thoughtful or conservative golfers may steadily navigate their way to birdie or par here, yet the adventurer may register anything between 3 and 10. It completes a quartet of engaging, dramatic, sometimes unique yet distinct and enjoyable par 5 holes on the course.

The final hole to come...
"The truth about golf courses has a slightly different expression for every golfer. Which of them, one might ask, is without the most definitive convictions concerning the merits or deficiencies of the links he plays over? Freedom of criticism is one of the last privileges he is likely to forgo."

Matthew Mollica

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: The National (Old) - Cape Schanck, Australia
« Reply #27 on: December 18, 2011, 01:34:32 AM »
#18, Par 4, 306m, Index 8.

The final hole on National (Old) is a short dogleg right par 4 with a portion of blind fairway, lots of bunkering, and a big curvy green. Going at the blind fairway segment with heroic drives on 17 is a common option – on 18 it is foolhardy. The risk of a lost ball is too high, and the gain too small for the risk. Most often a straight ball at the visible fairway bunker is the prudent play. Hybrids or fairway woods usually suffice. Some may cut a shot off the trap, and edge a little closer to the putting surface. The right quarter of the fairway also affords better angles into many pins. The walk to the first tee allows intelligent golfers the chance to sight the pin on 18 too. The final tee shot looks like this



A 200m drive usually leaves 9iron or wedge approach – maybe something longer if the wind is up and the pin is back.
This is the view from next to the fairway bunker visible from the tee.



Under the original sequence, this hole was the 13th – as the home hole, it is played later in the day by a higher number of players. It’s orientation is an unfortunate negative of the renumbering. Noone likes playing the final approach while looking into the setting sun.


An extra club is needed when approaching pins on the back edge of the green, yet this is done with a degree of trepidation - long of the green is tough. A mown bank wisks balls away to a point where par recovery is quite unlikely. Those who take an aggressive line off the tee carry tea-tree all the way, to a blind segment of fairway, bunkered left and right, with the fairway running away obliquely towards the green. Some brutes have been known to drive the green. Bold drives yield a lob wedge approach which looks like this.


The green on 18 is bunkered left and right - the right side traps are cavernous. A marked ridge defines front and back green segments, with more subtle movement to each green segment. The short grass between the two traps left of the green is banked, and is a great but not obvious target when playing to front pins – balls often release from the bank, and feed into frequently used hole locations. Putting up the ridge from front to back is often faster than many suspect – it is towards Bass Strait after all...



Again – the appearance of a sub 310m par 4 on the card might lead one to suspect a reachable and tempting par 4 – 18 is not really that sort of animal. It is another hole where play to position is the smarter way to go.

MM
"The truth about golf courses has a slightly different expression for every golfer. Which of them, one might ask, is without the most definitive convictions concerning the merits or deficiencies of the links he plays over? Freedom of criticism is one of the last privileges he is likely to forgo."

Matthew Mollica

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: The National (Old) - Cape Schanck, Australia
« Reply #28 on: December 19, 2011, 04:30:35 AM »
Retiring to the Clubhouse (some say it’s like a Qantas Club lounge), the post-round drinks allowed our group to reflect on the game.

The benches outside are a good spot to enjoy a drink too - complete with the Ocean view.


Nash Old is a fun course. Holes running in all directions, over heaving, sandy, coastal ground. Lots of different drive lines and angles depending upon the wind, the state of a match, pin position, and one’s ability. Great bunkering and endless interest around the greens. Thrilling shots, and a setting with few equals.

Robert Trent Jones Jnr once trumpeted – "The National will make me famous - either as the designer who has created one of the world’s great golf courses or a designer who stuffed up some of the best golf course real estate imaginable". I have not played a significant number of Trent Jones Jnr’s courses, but simply cannot believe he has designed or built anything which surpasses his work at The National.

On a quality site, yet one presenting some design difficulties, there is a steady supply of rewarding, exciting and challenging shots to be played. And endless fun, along with reward for creativity, around the greens. The course does boast many forced carries, which if not successfully negotiated result in “hitting three from the tee”. For this reason, and the visually imposing nature of the course, Old is not a place to take beginners.

A friend often says of National (Old) – “There’s not a weak hole out there!” While I don’t totally agree with him – I see where he’s coming from. On every hole, there’s several ways of getting to the hole in par or less. There’s choices relating to line and club on 14 tees, and the angles into greens really matter. Coming into many Old greens from the wrong segment of the fairway is almost asking for bogey. Very few courses offer such a premium with tee shots aimed for and finding a selected 20% of fairway width. National (Old) does it well and repeatedly.

The course is also remarkably elastic and playable across all sorts of winds. Through the years, with varying conditions, my shots into the 2nd and 7th greens for example have been played with Pitching Wedge and 3 Wood, and all clubs between. Consistently ranked inside the nation’s Top 20, the course may still be under-rated. An invitation to play Old is rarely knocked back. On a 10-round split test with most courses in Australia, Old would perform very well. It’s fun, memorable and unique – one can’t ask for much more than that.

MM
"The truth about golf courses has a slightly different expression for every golfer. Which of them, one might ask, is without the most definitive convictions concerning the merits or deficiencies of the links he plays over? Freedom of criticism is one of the last privileges he is likely to forgo."

George Freeman

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: The National (Old) - Cape Schanck, Australia
« Reply #29 on: December 19, 2011, 11:30:08 AM »
Thanks again for the tour Matt.

The course looks really cool.  I like all the rolling topography in the fairways and the greens and green complexes look really fun. 

However, the course does look very challenging/penalizing from the tee (on a windy site no less), especially with what looks like impenetrable brush right off most fairways.  Is this the case or are the pictures making it look more narrow than it is?
Mayhugh is my hero!!

"I love creating great golf courses.  I love shaping earth...it's a canvas." - Donald J. Trump

Matthew Mollica

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: The National (Old) - Cape Schanck, Australia
« Reply #30 on: December 21, 2011, 06:29:42 AM »
George, the course looks intimidating - more intimidating than it is.

The fairways are quite wide, and exceptionally so on some holes.
Some are 80 yards across. As you point out though, missing is deadly.
The vegetation off to the sides is thick indeed.

It is quite a manageable course for the most part. Even on a 1 or 2 club wind day,
there's only half a dozen times where driver's required for many golfers.

MM
"The truth about golf courses has a slightly different expression for every golfer. Which of them, one might ask, is without the most definitive convictions concerning the merits or deficiencies of the links he plays over? Freedom of criticism is one of the last privileges he is likely to forgo."

Justin Ryan

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: The National (Old) - Cape Schanck, Australia
« Reply #31 on: January 23, 2012, 08:12:40 AM »
Thanks for that...so is Moonah still regarded as the best of the three ?
There are plenty who have never rated Moonah above Old. As Matthew notes, the Old is fun. It is challenging, strategic, spectacular and demands imagination to score well. The Moonah in contrast has little of this, being yet another long modern draining golf course. But I will admit a prejudice against long, boring modern golf courses. It peaks early and then becomes a slog on the way back. I got sick of it pretty quickly.

If you only had a single day down there I'd suggest playing Old and St Andrews Beach.  The $25 twilight deal at St Andrews Beach is phenomenal value.

Tags:
Tags:

An Error Has Occurred!

Call to undefined function theme_linktree()
Back