The first ones that I thought of...
17 at Oakmont
1 at Myopia
9 at Chicago Highlands
17 at Oakmont great example.
Is #1 at Myopia anything other than a short uphill hole?
When I played it, the mystery of the uphill and it being #1 with no warmup made it a 5 wood, but when I got up there it looked like driver would've been the play without a ton of strategy but rather mere execution. (I could be wrong as I've only played it once)
Does the comparative lack of visibility make it a bit harder to design a short par 4 strategically for a first time/one time player?
note:I like uphill holes
Scott,
I've never been a big fan of #2 at National.(but I must say your picture is awesome and makes me rethink)
and definitely fits the definition of risk reward
Just seems so favorable to big hitters vs others.
Perhaps if the tee was 30 yards back
I've hit the green with 3 wood many times and 5 wood downwind, while my amateurs have to drive into a hole with a horriffic angle to a green running away (or are blind)
There seems to be no risk reward for shorter hitters (no way to take a preferred angle short a la 10 at Riviera or 5 at Long Cove)
I Like #3 at Fishers where distance has to match line taken
What's over the hill at RM