Its difficult to explain, but for me Aberdeen is one of those courses which I like as much as its quality. There are some courses which I like far more than their quality because of certain (often quirky) features which I personally believe are the height of good architecture. Examples would be Cavendish, Beau Desert, Michigan, Burnham, Kington, Tenby, Brora etc. Aberdeen on the other hand is no nonsense high quality golf throughout. A minor championship course that can bear its teeth mightily in certain circumstances. Other courses like this are Formby and Porthcawl. In a way, so is Prestwick, but I hold that course in higher regard because somehow it manages to be at once funky and suitable for minor championships. I am one of those that think the back nine is far better than its reputation (much like front nine ay Pyle & Kenfig) and would really like to see the changes made some years back.
Ciao