I doubt there will ever be an instance where the PGA, USGA or Euro PGA will make any decisions on what course they use, or how they present their product based on the complaints expressed in these many threads.
The PGA like all the other 3 majors, and all tour stops globally and here in US are predicated on profit, maximizing profit and marketing of the entire golf industry from ball and impliment, to sports drink to memberships, to providing the players with their own branding and marketing platforms.
What course they play this on will now and forever more always be predicated on the logistics of presenting the product first and foremost as a marketing platform to maximize profits. That is all...
If you want a purer form of golf on more interesting courses, perhaps the Walker Cup or regional amatuer events, are the place to go.
I am in full sympathy with the folks on the architecture of these major venues (only the Open escapes this remodelling to a degree), but they are never going to play a course on 99.9% of the consensus favorites here on GCA. The Winged Foots, Pebble, Oakmonts are still in the rota subject to tweaking for degree of difficulty-competition, and it is what it is. And what it is remains a commercial global business. And, these commercial aspects and considerations are in basically all professional sports, where purists in those sports all are perpetually howling how the sports are being ruined; yet they buy the tickets!
So, if you are bored, go out an play a round at your most affordable for you, and best choice you can make based on what you like in a golf course design, and skip thepro-major toon-a-mint viewing...
...unless you like to come on GCA.com to criticize and analyze the subject, to no avail or effect.