Terry, I asked the same question reference if some of these fellows have the one-hit karma or a bright shiny future. Obviously, we don't know. But, I'm sure it is good for golf channel analysts to declare Keegan the next decade superstar, for a couple majors to come, regardless of how he actually does.
I will say that I liked Keegan's demeanor, and the camera work on his eyes and focus out there gave some reason to believe this young man is very good and has something very competitive and athletically defining as a winner about him.
I really think the course was up to the task of providing a proper venue and the archie and set-up accomplished its job. My earlier idea of if it gave a chance to experienced old vets who still can make the shots, or just a series of tricked up holes that are so over the top, that favors youthful enthusiasm and not enough experience to be effected or flustered, seemed mostly answered, in my mind. The old vets had their chances and I didn't see them being unduly punished by the course difficulty or tricked up aspects. They had their chance, fairly, IMHO.