The Berkshire is among the best days out in all of golf (and the bang for your buck is ridiculously good), but I found myself wondering today whether by building two full-length 18-hole courses on the land, the club lost the opportunity to build one absolutely superlative courses -- well inside the world top 100 sort of course -- and then make of the remaining land what fit: a par three course or little "executive" course?
If you look at the dozen or so best greensites on the property, IMO you come up with:
Red - 2, 5, 8, 10, 12, 15, 16.
Blue - 1, 9, 12, 13, 14, 15.
Then there are holes such as 11 Blue, 13 Red, 11 Red, 18 Blue, which are wonderful holes despite lesser (to varying degrees) greensites than those above.
My recollection from a previous discussion with a few English GCA members was that when we set down to finding a preferred composite course, the holes were fairly well split between the two courses. Freed from the constraints of using the holes as they are, but having all that land to use for 18 holes, I think something even more special could have been achieved.
Thoughts? Am I wrong?