Thanks Pat. You make a couple really good points.
Overlake is notoriously wet, particularly throughout the low-lying back nine. A letter from Mr. Macan to the club, dated from the early 1950s before the course was constructed, strongly suggests that drainage is going to be the biggest issue for the course. It still is. But, as Pat points out, Scott and his staff have made remarkable strides in this area over the past five years, improving drainage and instigating a heavy and frequent top-dress program. In fact, during the summer, I'd like to see another course in the Pacific Northwest that plays as firm as Overlake (particularly the greens).
Green surface expansion and relative adjustment to fairway patterns is a huge component of the golf course improvement plan, too. All of the greens have been expanded/restored; and, as Pat points out, some adjustment to fairways patterns has been made. There's more to come, after we sort out some of the bunker and tree issues. Everywhere I consult there's a group of people who argue that expanding/restoring the green surfaces is going to make the course "easier". This couldn't be further from the truth. Expanding the greens provides opportunity to cut holes closer to greenside hazards - including bunkers and slopes - and empashizes the importance of playing strategic angles. I wouldn't say it makes a course "easier" or "harder", just more interesting... and often more uniquely attractive.
Here's another tee shot view of the 12th green, taken a few weeks ago (with a flagstick in the green), to compare with the before shot Scott's posted above. If I'm not mistaken, the hole "officially" re-opens for play today.
![](http://i517.photobucket.com/albums/u340/jeff_mingay/Overlake12TeeShotMarch2011.jpg)