Is it possible to give a good judgment on a course from TV or photographs?
Just looked at a small bit of the coverage of the course in Bahrain. It looks interesting, plenty of movement and criticism from the tour pros which is an attraction for me, but I don't really get a very good feel of the movement or elevation changes without playing the course or at least walking it.
Augusta is probably a better example, we all know it very well, but everybody that I know that has been there says that they never had an idea of the real elevation changes until you get there. The 18th is a great example, it looks fractionally uphill on tv but is meant to be substantially uphill in reality.
Do first time Augusta visitors here get amazed by the elevation changes as well?