Jeff, I don't see how someone younger could have the insights or connections that Pat has.
I wouldn't question his desire to make the sport as great as it use to be.
Maybe this thread was a lark, and truthfully, I expected it to have zero responses after the initial response was non-existent.
I doubt I would feel this way if I hadn't attended Pat's Mountain Ridge outing. Seeing how well he handled it all, and having read him for years, now, I stand by assertion that Pat would be the best we could hope for, if the architecture is ever going to be considered as great an influence, as I feel it has, in all matters of golf. It's past and future.
Scott,
It's that thought provoking style that Pat uses that would make him a good choice. Better than someone who thinks they have all the answers and dictates them.
David, I wouldn't question your intentions either.
Patrick's tenaciousness is what is needed.