Like others, I have used several, but didn't bother to mention those at Indian Creek, Quarry, Wilderness, etc.
It does raise the question though about the evolution of design. It strikes me that perhaps the natural hazards in the old days may have also been random. After courses started getting architected, it probably made sense to not have random hazards. After all, is randon condusive to strategic, or is carefully placed condusive to strategic?
Random could be sort of anti-strategy in many cases, if not enough room to reasonable land a ball exists between such hazards, effectively eliminating that as a planned route of play. Once bunkers became less random and more scientfic, they bracketed proposed landing zones, but once you put one in the middle, you are really just creating two landing zones, and in reality, perhaps the great depression killed them off, with the thinking that for the most part, one LZ per hole should be enough.....