Rebuilding the greens was an option, albeit an expensive one. The aggressive practices employed by our new Supt, really began to show its progress at seasons end. And that was only the first season.
I don't know if it was through laziness, cost cutting, or whatever, but the soil properties were not accurately maintained. I believe there was far too little top dressing, core aeration was simply not done. The greens would get punched in May, and once in maybe Sept. Not sure if verticuts were ever used. I think it was just the drill and fill. I would imagine not doing any cutting of your greens to allow for sand and air, and other nutrients to build, allows the course to be in great shape longer. I.E you dont have greens with holes in them. But I really have no recollection of members complaining about too much aeration of the greens, cutting down on the time the greens are in top shape.
I don't know if a committee lowered his budget in general, and this was an easy fix to bring the top line expense number down. If that was the case, no one is admitting it.
Everyone at the club is behind our new Supt. Everyone feels like the work he has put into the course has really started to move the land in the right direction. We all understand this will take time, but in the end, it will provide great results to our frustrated membership. I am very excited to see how well the course is playing next September. We are really fortunate to have made a great decision in hiring our new Super. Like I said before, he is a blessing, and I truly believe the course will be better than it was in the 70's - when firm and fast was the mantra and if you were above the hole on 18, you're putting off the green.
I knew we made a good decision when he introduced his dogs, Samson & Delilah - any deadheads around?