Hi,
Marty, it is easy to be very frustrated about this, but that wasn't the reason for my thread. I am interested to learn about how we got to the current situation. I am unaware of the Links Trust sharing the data they must have to justify the use of mats.
It does surprise me that the locals are not more demonstrative about the situation. Perhaps it means they agree with the use of mats for the late autumn, winter and early spring period?
Golf Courses have never been museums pieces to me. They are there to be played. I doubt there are 5,000 rounds played on TOC from Dec- March, so the damage would be very limited, and able to overcome in the spring. By all means, close the courses when it is frosty or frozen, but if they are open, then let them be played. On the years when the Open Championship in on TOC, then there is some justification to close the course in the weeks before the event, but perhaps the alternative is to keep the course open in that last month, but use mats? (Note- I liked the way the course was kept open in 2007 for the Women's British Open up until the week before.... and the course looked the best I had ever seen it.
The precedent the Links Trust are setting by extending the use is potentially disastrous to the game. Many country's around the world look to St Andrews for direction, and if those course start employing the use of mats then the players could, imaginably, start leaving the game.
Anyway, enough doom and gloom, what I would like to invite the Links Trust to do is share with us the benefits of mats. Perhaps justify their reasons for using mats. There must be some?
scott