The discussion over at the Pound Ridge thread raises an interesting question.
When I interviewed Perry on opening day at Pound Ridge, he agreed that it's a Perry Dye golf course, even though his dad popped in and helped, obviously.
Now Pound Ridge is a unique case because it's shoehorned into a tight space...most holes run back an forth along a common axis in a large square area, so when people say that the main criticism of Perry's work there is that it lacks some of his dad's strategies - like alternate shot patterns..i.e. fade off the tee, draw into the green, then vice versa - or lacks the strength of routing that Pete is known for, and that PRGC looks like a Pete Dye, but doesn't play like a Pete Dye
...the fair response to that criticism is that Pound Ridge may be a bad case study because it had so many restrictions on the property that it's not truly definitive of Perry's work.
So I ask those of you that have played other Perry courses, how are Pete and Perry different from one another?