Tim,
A belated apology for the frivolousness of my curiosities. I can assure you, however, that I have plenty of audiences elsewhere and am not seeking anything from this thread other than discussion.
As always, you bring up some great points that I think would be useful for discussion. I think you are right in that I did not give the off-season and local rates thorough consideration prior to my response. Perhaps this is where Bandon as a foil for my premise will fail. I think some background will aid in clarification.
When I read Eric's post regarding walkable "public" golf courses and him citing Bandon as the "obvious" choice I wondered, what does "public" mean. I wondered whether access to a large number of people is what as meant by "public" and if so, is Bandon really accessible to a large number of people. Hence my original question. Thanks to this thread, which you believe is of questionable motivation, another question has come up. What is a "private" club and what are the general barriers to entry.
I think that other than the marginal club, the general barrier to entry for a country club is money. Particularly in this economic climate, when clubs are reducing initiations and closing doors, there seems to be fewer of the intangible barriers leaving only money as the obstacle for being a member of a "private" club. If money is the only thing keeping one from being a member of a private club and money is the only thing making Bandon less accessible then is Bandon "private" or, are many "private" clubs actually (and pursuant to yours and others definitions) public?
Or, alternatively, and getting to Peter's post, is the difference not one of substance but one of symbol or form. Meaning, is Bandon "public" because they say they are and private club X where anyone with the money can join "private" only because they say they are? And effectively, are they the same.
Thanks for your posts and sorry for the distraction.