author=Ronald Tricks O'Hooligan Montesano link=topic=45961.msg1020045#msg1020045 date=1287367396
1. Are we EVER going to get together for that round at Park Club? Yes, if it makes you feel any better, I’ve cancelled more rounds this year than I’ve actually played. I even cancelled a round at Oakmont a week ago to make an evening meeting at Park CC. My work year is mostly from April 1st to October 30th and I’m often struggling to keep up with my schedule. I drop golf every time I have a conflict with work and because of that I almost never schedule much golf any more. I play when I travel.
200 yard 10th at Park Country Club
2. Is Park the Colt/Alison course you cautiously refer to earlier in this thread? I couldn’t find the reference.
I’ve worked with two courses where Charles Alison was involved. Park Country Club which was designed by Alison. The other was Weston G&CC (Park Jr.) which was bunkered by Alison one year after Park’s went home because of poor health (the course was built without bunkering). The last is Toronto GC which was designed by Harry Colt (where all I spent two years recommending tree removal and to leave the design alone and intact).
3. What about Park Club surprised you most? The site is very average, the golf is not.
It’s a terrific example of how architects have no excuses. Alison created really wonderful green sites over very ordinary land. The combination of fill pads and undulation created enough strategic and visual interest to make this a compelling place to play. The bunkering is also carved out from almost nothing and yet each bunker is beautiful and deep enough to be meaningful. This was an outstanding piece of “architecture” on a pretty mundane site.
The 145 yard 16th at Cherry Hill, with hidden bunkers in back right and back left
4. Cherry Hill is a great Travis course on an apparently ordinary piece of land (not a Lookout Point topography by any stretch). Can you discuss its importance in his body of work, since it didn't make your Travis Top Five? I hummed and hawed about including the course in my top 5 Travis courses because it’s the only one I know with all 18 greens, but the 15 original greens at Scranton are a lot wilder and have a few ideas that I’ve never seen before.
Cherry Hill was a tough site to build a course, being flat, on clay and having the water table only two to three feet below grade. The only break in the landscape is the single 20’ hill where the clubhouse sits. What I like about the course is the fact that so many of the green sites fall with the direction of the grade (backwards and sideways) and how much impact this has on the need to play short and run the ball in during the summer.
I don’t think we build enough greens with left to right or right to left cross-fall since that has such an enormous impact of positional play and the need to work the ball. It’s such a subtle and inexpensive method of defending our greens yet I can barely think of a modern example. There are lots of good examples at Cherry Hill.
The 195 yard 14th at Stafford with its 10 foot Travis made mounds
5. Do you know Stafford (between Buffalo and Rochester), another of Travis' courses? I began working with them in the 1990’s. I’ve helped the club with bunkering (flashed up sand was at clubs insistence – work was early on for me), tree removal, tee work and short grass recapturing (recent work). The course is great fun to play and the 11th is my single most favourite Travis hole that I have seen. That green has no rivals in golf, there is nothing like it anywhere.