For what its worth, I think Brandel Chamblee (or someone from Golf Channel) said it was a poor risk/reward, short par 4. I agree. I have said this about par 5's in the past, and I can say it here, if a green is reachable by 75+ percent of the field in a given event, its not a par 5 or par 4. #6 at Pebble Beach is not a par 5, #17 at Oakmont is not a par 4, #13 and #15 at Augusta are not par 5's and so on. But whatever. This is match play, so it makes little difference either way. Still a less than great hole though.