Richard Choi writes:
I have yet to meet anyone who "plays as it lies". Not at tournaments, not at GCA get togethers, not anywhere.My friends and I play two different games were we do not touch the ball between the tee and the hole. One is match play, where if you can not play the ball you are out of the hole and your opponent wins that hole. No touching the ball at all.
The other is a modified medal play, where if at any point during the round you can not play the ball as it lies you are out of the competition. The winner is the player who makes it through the most holes, if it is a tie, then it is the golfers at the end still in the game who has the lowest score.
It's a very enjoyable day when we play these games.
I understand this is a little two "unfair" for many of you golfers obsessed with fairness.
I still think touching the ball should be kept to a minimum. And when you do touch the ball (interference) it should be replaced exactly how you found it. Other than interference and perhaps GUI, any time you touch the ball it should cost you a stroke (Paul, that would be consistent with the 1744 Muirfield rules.)
Scott Warren writes:
I'm more of a "live and let live" sort of guy myself... play the version of the game that makes you happy.I have no problem with people playing golf however they want, as long as they leave the course as they found it and they don't hold me up behind them. I do have a problem with the ruling bodies taking the game away from the spirit of the game -- which is keeping your f&#king hands off the golf ball.
Cheers,
Dan King
What golf has of honour, what it has of justice, of fair play, of good fellowship, and sportsmanship - in a word, what is best in golf - is almost surely traceable to the inspiration of the Royal and Ancient.
--Isaac Grainger