Thanks David and Tom. Glad to see you working together!
Thanks. Tom and I have teamwork down to an artform with a perfect division of labor. TEPaul's job is to regale us with stories of
who he knows and how
I couldn't possibly know anything without knowing who he knows. In contrast, my job is to actually do research and provide facts.
And the fact is that, contrary to TEPaul's claim above,
CBM told us what he took from the 12th hole at Biarritz in the article he wrote for Outing magazine after his 1906 trip abroad to study golf courses. I've quoted it at least two or three times before in this thread, and it is also reprinted in Scotland's Gift (with a typo,) but here again is what
CBM wrote about the Biarritz after his 1906 trip abroad:
"210 yards. Suggested by the 12th at Biarritz, making sharp hog back in the middle of the course. Stop 30 yards from the hole bunkered to the right of green and good low ground to the left of plateau green."As far as how the hole played
in 1913 when Whigham wrote about it, noone here is old enough to have played it then. Except for maybe Patrick.
I haven't had the pleasure of playing Piping Rock, but if I had, I would not be so arrogant as to say or imply that H.J. Whigham's description of the hole was inaccurate. So far as I know H.J. Whigham not only knew a thing or two about golf and golf courses here and abroad, he was with CBM in 1906 when they were in France studying golf courses, and likely saw the inspiration for the Biarritz with CBM. HJW's writing showed an acute understanding of the strategic underpinnings of CBM's favorite golf holes, perhaps moreso than did CBM's writing. (This is perhaps to be expected, since HJW was a well-regarded writer who knew how to get his point across. ) On top of this, HJW was a valued friend of and advisor to CBM and reportedly assisted CBM with some of his designs.
So if H.J. Whigham tells me about a hole at Piping Rock, I am inclined to take his word for it even over the word of someone who claims to be an expert because his father happened to be a member.
I am still chuckling at TEPaul scolding you for going to George Bahto for information and answers about CBM and his courses and essentially tells you to come to him instead. As if playing the course as a child somehow establishes TEPaul as the foremost expert on all things Macdonald! But then it gets back to the division of labor I mentioned above. For TEPaul,
what you know is far less important than
who you know.