News:

This discussion group is best enjoyed using Google Chrome, Firefox or Safari.


Chris Buie

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has GCA.com jumped the shark?
« Reply #75 on: August 11, 2010, 05:36:39 PM »
I've found that when people are talking/writing about others they are usually making more of a statement about themselves than the other person.
For instance, when an individual is making a gratuitously disrespectful comment about another person they think that they are pointing out the other persons character flaws.  In fact, they are telling me much more about their own character than the person they are needlessly attacking.

Richard Choi

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has GCA.com jumped the shark?
« Reply #76 on: August 11, 2010, 05:38:35 PM »
Chris, did you just invoke "I'm rubber you're glue"? :)

Jon Heise

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has GCA.com jumped the shark?
« Reply #77 on: August 11, 2010, 05:43:11 PM »
I've found that when people are talking/writing about others they are usually making more of a statement about themselves than the other person.
For instance, when an individual is making a gratuitously disrespectful comment about another person they think that they are pointing out the other persons character flaws.  In fact, they are telling me much more about their own character than the person they are needlessly attacking.


Well done!
I still like Greywalls better.

Jeff Fortson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has GCA.com jumped the shark?
« Reply #78 on: August 11, 2010, 05:47:22 PM »
I've found that when people are talking/writing about others they are usually making more of a statement about themselves than the other person.
For instance, when an individual is making a gratuitously disrespectful comment about another person they think that they are pointing out the other persons character flaws.  In fact, they are telling me much more about their own character than the person they are needlessly attacking.

Example?


JF
#nowhitebelt

JC Jones

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has GCA.com jumped the shark?
« Reply #79 on: August 11, 2010, 05:50:28 PM »
I've found that when people are talking/writing about others they are usually making more of a statement about themselves than the other person.
For instance, when an individual is making a gratuitously disrespectful comment about another person they think that they are pointing out the other persons character flaws.  In fact, they are telling me much more about their own character than the person they are needlessly attacking.

Example?


JF

perhaps? ;) ;D

Quote
Melvyn,

At what point did I condemn people for having opinions in my post?  I'm all for differing opinions.  If I'm a "hypocrite" then what does criticizing my opinion make you?  Do you see your own hypocrisy?  At what point did I suggest you, personally, not be allowed to post or say anything?  How am I infringing on your free speech?  Don't I have the right to share my opinions too?  Or, is that reserved for the great-great grandchildren of famous golfers?  I never even brought up free speech.  Are you drunk?

I'm not going to get in some pissing match with you.  Considering how well known you have made it that you are the great-great grandson of Tom Morris I guess that would lump you in with the "relatives of famous golfers" group.  Oops. 

Let me share an opinion with you...  being the alleged great-great grandson of Tom Morris (while being a very cool thing) does not make you any more of an authority on golf than anyone else.  Speak your mind.  Please.  But don't try to support your beliefs based on your genes.  I've read so many posts of yours where I visualize your great-great grandfather rolling his eyes and wanting to say "shut the fuck up lad".  That's MY opinion.

As for not having the "bottle" aka "balls" and being a "coward", well believe whatever you like.  I don't need to prove anything to someone that bases the value of their own opinions on the fact that they were made from Old Tom Morris's baby batter. 

I really missed you Melvyn.  Thanks for the laugh.  Now I'm remembering why I left in the first place.


Jeff F.
I get it, you are mad at the world because you are an adult caddie and few people take you seriously.

Excellent spellers usually lack any vision or common sense.

I know plenty of courses that are in the red, and they are killing it.

Chris Shaida

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has GCA.com jumped the shark?
« Reply #80 on: August 11, 2010, 05:55:24 PM »
Chris, did you just invoke "I'm rubber you're glue"? :)

 :-X

(but really OT, I can't wait for some verb form related to the movie Inception to make it into common parlance ('inceptioned'?) analogizing the dreams within dreams within dreams deal...)

Jeff Fortson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has GCA.com jumped the shark?
« Reply #81 on: August 11, 2010, 05:56:46 PM »
I've found that when people are talking/writing about others they are usually making more of a statement about themselves than the other person.
For instance, when an individual is making a gratuitously disrespectful comment about another person they think that they are pointing out the other persons character flaws.  In fact, they are telling me much more about their own character than the person they are needlessly attacking.

Example?


JF

perhaps? ;) ;D

Quote
Melvyn,

At what point did I condemn people for having opinions in my post?  I'm all for differing opinions.  If I'm a "hypocrite" then what does criticizing my opinion make you?  Do you see your own hypocrisy?  At what point did I suggest you, personally, not be allowed to post or say anything?  How am I infringing on your free speech?  Don't I have the right to share my opinions too?  Or, is that reserved for the great-great grandchildren of famous golfers?  I never even brought up free speech.  Are you drunk?

I'm not going to get in some pissing match with you.  Considering how well known you have made it that you are the great-great grandson of Tom Morris I guess that would lump you in with the "relatives of famous golfers" group.  Oops. 

Let me share an opinion with you...  being the alleged great-great grandson of Tom Morris (while being a very cool thing) does not make you any more of an authority on golf than anyone else.  Speak your mind.  Please.  But don't try to support your beliefs based on your genes.  I've read so many posts of yours where I visualize your great-great grandfather rolling his eyes and wanting to say "shut the fuck up lad".  That's MY opinion.

As for not having the "bottle" aka "balls" and being a "coward", well believe whatever you like.  I don't need to prove anything to someone that bases the value of their own opinions on the fact that they were made from Old Tom Morris's baby batter. 

I really missed you Melvyn.  Thanks for the laugh.  Now I'm remembering why I left in the first place.


Jeff F.

Just what did you learn about me from that? Funny that you didn't bring the same thing up to Melvyn after he called me a coward.  Better yet, aren't you engaged in the same activity by calling me out for my opinion of Melvyn?  I miss this website!  

JF
#nowhitebelt

James Boon

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has GCA.com jumped the shark?
« Reply #82 on: August 11, 2010, 05:59:14 PM »
Actually, I am not sure that 'jump the shark' is the appropriate term anyway.

It means to turn into absurdity rather than just decline after many years. The TV show Law and Order is declining after almost 20 years, but hasn't become absurd.

I think the phrase "jumped the shark" has jumped the shark.

Indeed! I much prefer the "Nuked the fridge" analogy...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jumping_the_shark
 ;D

Okay, so I still consider myself fairly new around here but the DG as a whole is still very educational, informative and entertaining. All in all a great resource and place to discuss a subject with like minded people. And as for the occasional T***r or M****n thread, if they bother you, just dont read them? And who was it that said there was porn on the interent? Wel,some of the photo threads on here are certainly golf porn!  ;)

On a serious note, has anyone considered splitting the DG into a series of different sub headings so that us like minded people can discuss various subjects, knowing what we are letting ourselves in for? For instance we could have:

- Historical interest
- Architects
- Maintenance
- Photo tours
- "Access Whoring"  ;D Sorry, scrub that one...
- OT

or something like that anyway, where different topic threads could be posted under different headings? Could this work? Would people be happier to only visit say the Historical or Photo Tour area, and therefore not get put off by all the T***r thread?

Cheers,

James

ps I just noticed that when I put M****n I meant Merion, and not a certain relative of a famous old Scottish golfer...




2023 Highlights: Hollinwell (Notts), Brora, Aberdovey, Royal St Davids, Woodhall Spa, Broadstone, Parkstone, Cleeve, Painswick, Minchinhampton, Hoylake

"It celebrates the unadulterated pleasure of being in a dialogue with nature while knocking a ball round on foot." Richard Pennell

JC Jones

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has GCA.com jumped the shark?
« Reply #83 on: August 11, 2010, 06:03:37 PM »
I've found that when people are talking/writing about others they are usually making more of a statement about themselves than the other person.
For instance, when an individual is making a gratuitously disrespectful comment about another person they think that they are pointing out the other persons character flaws.  In fact, they are telling me much more about their own character than the person they are needlessly attacking.

Example?


JF

perhaps? ;) ;D

Quote
Melvyn,

At what point did I condemn people for having opinions in my post?  I'm all for differing opinions.  If I'm a "hypocrite" then what does criticizing my opinion make you?  Do you see your own hypocrisy?  At what point did I suggest you, personally, not be allowed to post or say anything?  How am I infringing on your free speech?  Don't I have the right to share my opinions too?  Or, is that reserved for the great-great grandchildren of famous golfers?  I never even brought up free speech.  Are you drunk?

I'm not going to get in some pissing match with you.  Considering how well known you have made it that you are the great-great grandson of Tom Morris I guess that would lump you in with the "relatives of famous golfers" group.  Oops. 

Let me share an opinion with you...  being the alleged great-great grandson of Tom Morris (while being a very cool thing) does not make you any more of an authority on golf than anyone else.  Speak your mind.  Please.  But don't try to support your beliefs based on your genes.  I've read so many posts of yours where I visualize your great-great grandfather rolling his eyes and wanting to say "shut the fuck up lad".  That's MY opinion.

As for not having the "bottle" aka "balls" and being a "coward", well believe whatever you like.  I don't need to prove anything to someone that bases the value of their own opinions on the fact that they were made from Old Tom Morris's baby batter. 

I really missed you Melvyn.  Thanks for the laugh.  Now I'm remembering why I left in the first place.


Jeff F.

Just what did you learn about me from that? Funny that you didn't bring the same thing up to Melvyn after he called me a coward.  Better yet, aren't you engaged in the same activity by calling me out for my opinion of Melvyn?  I miss this website!  

JF

Jeff F.,

I've learned that you have a great sense of humor ???

I miss those fun loving threads from the good ol days when you would discuss politics.....
I get it, you are mad at the world because you are an adult caddie and few people take you seriously.

Excellent spellers usually lack any vision or common sense.

I know plenty of courses that are in the red, and they are killing it.

Chris Buie

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has GCA.com jumped the shark?
« Reply #84 on: August 11, 2010, 06:16:20 PM »
Code: [Select]
Well done
See I can tell from Jon's comment he is a man of charm and exquisite taste!  ;)

Jeff, you are asking for an example of disrespectful commentary on this forum?  I don't think anything good would come from singling out a particular comment/person.  Let's just leave the idea out there for people to consider.  It's better that way, I think.  I really try not to rough up people on here and in life when I disagree.  Why would I want to belittle anybody?  Why would anybody want to do that?  

Richard, not quite sure what you mean.  Got to go to dinner now.  I'll be happy to respond to any question when I get back.

Jeff Fortson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has GCA.com jumped the shark?
« Reply #85 on: August 11, 2010, 06:23:44 PM »
JC,

My apologies.  I thought I was being set up for a second.  While there were both funny and mean spirited arguments about politics on here that I engaged in, I was wrong to do so.  It's one thing when a political discussion lasts a couple of posts but when this DG gets turned into Hannity and Colmes, it detracts from it, IMO.

Fortunately, I didn't burn too many bridges.  Those I did and those I am doing right now, I could care less about.  But, I didn't come to gca to talk about Obamacare or the fact that Sarah Palin is the most vapid, gut wrenchingly bad politican/pundit/celebrity on the planet.  I came here to talk about golf, and in particular, golf course architecture.  And, when I see the website lose its mojo because people have turned it into their Black Book of access whoring and their place to start a Notorious BIG vs. Tupac East Coast/West Coast war I start to understand why.  


Jeff F.
#nowhitebelt

JC Jones

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has GCA.com jumped the shark?
« Reply #86 on: August 11, 2010, 06:27:55 PM »
JC,

My apologies.  I thought I was being set up for a second.  While there were both funny and mean spirited arguments about politics on here that I engaged in, I was wrong to do so.  It's one thing when a political discussion lasts a couple of posts but when this DG gets turned into Hannity and Colmes, it detracts from it, IMO.

Fortunately, I didn't burn too many bridges.  Those I did and those I am doing right now, I could care less about.  But, I didn't come to gca to talk about Obamacare or the fact that Sarah Palin is the most vapid, gut wrenchingly bad politican/pundit/celebrity on the planet.  I came here to talk about golf, and in particular, golf course architecture.  And, when I see the website lose its mojo because people have turned it into their Black Book of access whoring and their place to start a Notorious BIG vs. Tupac East Coast/West Coast war I start to understand why.  


Jeff F.

Good deal.  Now that you and I are straight, do you still have any contacts at Riviera?
I get it, you are mad at the world because you are an adult caddie and few people take you seriously.

Excellent spellers usually lack any vision or common sense.

I know plenty of courses that are in the red, and they are killing it.

Melvyn Morrow

Re: Has GCA.com jumped the shark?
« Reply #87 on: August 11, 2010, 08:51:54 PM »

Jeff

Clearly you have not read my post correctly, so I again attach it below, perhaps you will find it easier a second time.

As for “But don't try to support your beliefs based on your genes” what a stupid comment to make when all I or others have to do is direct you to the history of the game. As for “ being the alleged great-great grandson of Tom Morris”, you have forgotten Charlie Hunter of Prestwick, George and Jack Morris Hoylake, James, Robert and John Hunter and old Willie Rusacks. Oh yes I missed Young Tommy Morris, J.OE Morris and a line to Allan Robertson as well. Cool I can’t say but fact yes.

Still not finished you come out with “I've read so many posts of yours where I visualize your great-great grandfather rolling his eyes and wanting to say "shut the fuck up lad". Well that might be your opinion, however I believe he would be pleased that someone is fighting to keep walking a major part of the game. I am certain he would hate carts and certainly any form of distance aids. He might even say why are golfers given up, has it become too hard to walk and think at the same time, but then that’s my opinion.

Copy of my original post on this subject, perhaps you will do me the courtesy of reading it this time.

Good for you to have the strength of your convections (hot air) and submit a topic all about your opinion on the sites DG

You made your case well and released some of the tension and frustration that certainly seems to have built up within you over the years.

Nevertheless you post screams of hypocrisy, why is it your right to voice your opinion no matter how strongly, yet you condemn others for doing the very same. You also have no balls in that you clearly make the following statement I'm sick of the elitist mentalities, the groveling access whores, and relatives of famous golfers telling us how the game should be played    yet will not name names having said that you have clearly single me out for your criticism.

As it’s a DG you have the right to an opinion whether we agree or not, that’s the point of a DG. The DG is a golfing forum for free ideas and opinions to be discussed or ignored by the members of the forum. In truth you are criticising the very right of others to have a say or voice, just because they do not go along with your way of thinking.

As for my point of view, it has always been just that, my point of view, my opinion on a DG. Its based upon a sincere belief that the game is moving away from its core traditions established over centuries. This DG is about golf and so I have every right to offer up my opinions on the subject.  How others interoperate my tone in my posts is down to them, all I say is that it is from the heart as golf, its people and its history including Prestwick and St Andrews have been ever present all my life. Clearly this is something I can only share with other members of my family who also care about the game. I have a unique insight to the game and so my opinions may well differ from those of others, yet I have no power to change anything, no authority just the freedom that this site offers me to post my opinions.   
 
You are a coward for not having the bottle to openly attack me or others by naming names but you make it very clear that you are sick of me and my right to free speech.

If I feel something is wrong at least, like it or not I voice my opinion and try and share my concerns with others who I was lead to believe were like minded.

Jeff, John Kyle and any others who feel the same way, let me state that whether I agree or not with your opinions or decided to debate the points of your topic, I still most sincerely believe that you have the right to that opinion, pity you don’t show the same courtesy and share that same value with others.
 
Melvyn



Patrick_Mucci

Re: Has GCA.com jumped the shark?
« Reply #88 on: August 11, 2010, 09:07:39 PM »
I understand what Jeff is trying to say.

OT's dilute the overall quality of the site and using the site to seek access remains a problem.
Both valid points.

Jeff also seems to lament the loss of participation by the likes of Geoff Shackelford, Gib Papazian, Tommy Nacarrato, Rich Goodale, Ran and many others.

Those participants are difficult to replace in terms of the quality of their contributions.

While the discussion group section of GCA.com is devoted to the discussion of GCA and related topics, "related topics" has become a stretch of the imagination.  More threads should be focused on GCA.  OT threads should be allowed to quickly move toward oblivion.

On that part, I also agree with Jeff.

As to the bickering, I don't mind it IF it PRODUCES valueable information.
I think the Merion threads, and there have been many of them dating back about 10 years, have almost always produced informative material.  Where it's just a cat fight, it becomes tedious, worthless.

One of the failures of the site has been the inability to extract more information from participating architects and superintendents.
We're very fortunate to have a good number of GCA's and GCS's contributing to the site.
You'd think that we could "pick their brains" more than we have.

I want to thank them for participating and contributing, they've been a great asset.

End of rant ;D

Mac Plumart

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has GCA.com jumped the shark?
« Reply #89 on: August 11, 2010, 09:25:02 PM »
Pat...

that is no rant, that is a good post.

You know I think the architects have shared a great deal.  I have numerous Jeff Brauer posts cut and pasted into my word files for continued reference.  Tom Doak and Forrest Richardson and debating Askernish right now.  Ian Andrew always posts GREAT stuff.  I could go on and on.

I think the issue is a lot of people don't want to listen, they want to tell. 

This website is GREAT...off the charts GREAT.  If you seek information, it is right here under your nose.  You just have to open up your ears/eyes.

In fact, Patrick you had a great post on Pine Tree and rankings and changes to the Top 100 courses over time.  Again, I think there were some fights and arguments and defensiveness on that thread.  But if we just took a step back and read it, listened, and thought...we all should have learned something from it.

Sportsman/Adventure loving golfer.

John_Conley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has GCA.com jumped the shark?
« Reply #90 on: August 11, 2010, 09:28:00 PM »
One of the failures of the site has been the inability to extract more information from participating architects and superintendents.
We're very fortunate to have a good number of GCA's and GCS's contributing to the site.
You'd think that we could "pick their brains" more than we have.

I want to thank them for participating and contributing, they've been a great asset.

When they're proud of what they consider some of their best work and it is routinely trashed by guys who live in a world of no constraints, it isn't a surprise they don't feel like going to that well again.

JC Jones

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has GCA.com jumped the shark?
« Reply #91 on: August 11, 2010, 09:29:10 PM »
Pat...

that is no rant, that is a good post.

You know I think the architects have shared a great deal.  I have numerous Jeff Brauer posts cut and pasted into my word files for continued reference.  Tom Doak and Forrest Richardson and debating Askernish right now.  Ian Andrew always posts GREAT stuff.  I could go on and on.

I think the issue is a lot of people don't want to listen, they want to tell. 

This website is GREAT...off the charts GREAT.  If you seek information, it is right here under your nose.  You just have to open up your ears/eyes.

In fact, Patrick you had a great post on Pine Tree and rankings and changes to the Top 100 courses over time.  Again, I think there were some fights and arguments and defensiveness on that thread.  But if we just took a step back and read it, listened, and thought...we all should have learned something from it.



I agree regarding Pat Mucci's posts.  Unless of course he is trying to convince you there are no swamps in Florida....
I get it, you are mad at the world because you are an adult caddie and few people take you seriously.

Excellent spellers usually lack any vision or common sense.

I know plenty of courses that are in the red, and they are killing it.

JC Jones

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has GCA.com jumped the shark?
« Reply #92 on: August 11, 2010, 09:29:55 PM »
One of the failures of the site has been the inability to extract more information from participating architects and superintendents.
We're very fortunate to have a good number of GCA's and GCS's contributing to the site.
You'd think that we could "pick their brains" more than we have.

I want to thank them for participating and contributing, they've been a great asset.

When they're proud of what they consider some of their best work and it is routinely trashed by guys who live in a world of no constraints, it isn't a surprise they don't feel like going to that well again.


Or better yet, when other architects and people in the industry trash their work......
I get it, you are mad at the world because you are an adult caddie and few people take you seriously.

Excellent spellers usually lack any vision or common sense.

I know plenty of courses that are in the red, and they are killing it.

Patrick_Mucci

Re: Has GCA.com jumped the shark?
« Reply #93 on: August 11, 2010, 09:36:01 PM »
One of the failures of the site has been the inability to extract more information from participating architects and superintendents.
We're very fortunate to have a good number of GCA's and GCS's contributing to the site.
You'd think that we could "pick their brains" more than we have.

I want to thank them for participating and contributing, they've been a great asset.

When they're proud of what they consider some of their best work and it is routinely trashed by guys who live in a world of no constraints, it isn't a surprise they don't feel like going to that well again.

John,

I think you have to differentiate between constructive criticism and destructive criticism.

Without constructive criticism, progress is impossible.

I think constructive criticism is a positive and should be welcome, even though it may be painful.

Sniping, on the other hand, should be dismissed.



Jeff Fortson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has GCA.com jumped the shark?
« Reply #94 on: August 11, 2010, 09:44:25 PM »

Jeff

Clearly you have not read my post correctly, so I again attach it below, perhaps you will find it easier a second time.

As for “But don't try to support your beliefs based on your genes” what a stupid comment to make when all I or others have to do is direct you to the history of the game. As for “ being the alleged great-great grandson of Tom Morris”, you have forgotten Charlie Hunter of Prestwick, George and Jack Morris Hoylake, James, Robert and John Hunter and old Willie Rusacks. Oh yes I missed Young Tommy Morris, J.OE Morris and a line to Allan Robertson as well. Cool I can’t say but fact yes.

Still not finished you come out with “I've read so many posts of yours where I visualize your great-great grandfather rolling his eyes and wanting to say "shut the fuck up lad". Well that might be your opinion, however I believe he would be pleased that someone is fighting to keep walking a major part of the game. I am certain he would hate carts and certainly any form of distance aids. He might even say why are golfers given up, has it become too hard to walk and think at the same time, but then that’s my opinion.


What the hell does this mean?  Can someone translate this for me?  I have never seen someone so incoherent on here.  I really don't understand what you are saying.  Do they teach grammar in Scotland?  No offense, but you make zero sense in your first paragraph.  

As for paragraph 2...  I don't disagree with you re: carts vs. walking and yardage guides and range finders.  I just think you come off as someone that relies on their lineage to make a point.  Just because you are related to Tom Morris doesn't mean that you are the authority on the spirit of the game.  Have your opinions, just don't try to validate them by claiming you know what your great-great grandfather would have said.  Why did Old Tom abandon the featherie and go with the guttie?  Wasn't that a step away from "tradition"?  Wasn't that a giant step to make regarding abandoning tradition for new technology?  You are undebatable Melvyn.  You are too wrapped up in your lineage and self-importance to be changed.

JF




« Last Edit: August 11, 2010, 11:09:51 PM by Jeff Fortson »
#nowhitebelt

David Kelly

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has GCA.com jumped the shark?
« Reply #95 on: August 11, 2010, 11:27:08 PM »
Actually, I am not sure that 'jump the shark' is the appropriate term anyway.

It means to turn into absurdity rather than just decline after many years. The TV show Law and Order is declining after almost 20 years, but hasn't become absurd.

I think the phrase "jumped the shark" has jumped the shark.

I think pointing out that the phrase "jumped the shark" has jumped the shark...has jumped the shark.
"Whatever in creation exists without my knowledge exists without my consent." - Judge Holden, Blood Meridian.

Matthew Rose

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has GCA.com jumped the shark?
« Reply #96 on: August 12, 2010, 12:29:44 AM »
Just a suggestion.... has anyone considered sub-forums? Or would that be too hard to maintain?

Archie forum, general golf forum, potpourri forum.
American-Australian. Trackman Course Guy. Fatalistic sports fan. Drummer. Bass player. Father. Cat lover.

Jeff Fortson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Has GCA.com jumped the shark?
« Reply #97 on: August 12, 2010, 12:40:05 AM »
Instead of "jump the shark" let's call it the "When GCA.com became a socialist muslim".  I want to see gca.com's birth certificate.   ::)


JF
#nowhitebelt

Jason McNamara

Re: Has GCA.com jumped the shark?
« Reply #98 on: August 12, 2010, 02:23:20 AM »
But, all the political bickering that I took part in I totally regret.  

Your statement in 85 boils down to "I didn't come here to talk about political things such as this political person at whom I direct an ad hominem comment."  

Serious question:  Is that really the kind of substantive contribution with which you wish to mark your return?  The slightly older (and Internet-adapted) version of "I'm not touching you!" is what you picked?

Quote
It should have never been brought up here.

As you say.

I look forward to your architecture comments.
« Last Edit: August 12, 2010, 02:32:40 AM by Jason McNamara »

Melvyn Morrow

Re: Has GCA.com jumped the shark?
« Reply #99 on: August 12, 2010, 03:02:09 AM »

Jeff

You don’t half talk a load of bullocks, so I feel it pointless posting further on this subject of yours.

However to make certain I am not seen pimping myself, I, as of today will not be meeting with any GCA.com Members who find themselves in St Andrews or Scotland this year or in the future. After all why would anyone want to speak to me face to face, certainly not because of my lineage nor would I want to promote my own self-importance. So thanks to you Jeff they have been saved from a fate worse than death.

As for GCA.com, well we have a DG we deserve thanks to the efforts of the silent majority who tolerate the whoring.

Keep chewing the cud, Jeff

Melvyn

Tags:
Tags:

An Error Has Occurred!

Call to undefined function theme_linktree()
Back