Brian
Bob’s book is great, I love the format and the way it is so easy to read and understand – I have been trying for the last year to get him to update the book, but at the moment he has other more important family matters to look after.
Having said that, Bob admits that his book does not cover all the courses connected with Old Tom. His list of Isle of Man courses is incomplete and slightly confusing because there are four courses on the Island designed by Old Tom, one having moved then returned to within a mile of Old Tom's original design. This course is today called Douglas Golf Club and was the one he mentioned as being at Duchess Head. The other courses are Castletown, Ramsey and King Edward Bay which is at the other side of Douglas and missed by Bob altogether believing Duchess Head and Douglas Head course being one and the same. Bob missed some English course, from memory I think they are Dewsbury, Kirby Muxloe, West Herts and Warkworth, the two on Guernsey and quite a few missed in Scotland i.e. he did two courses in Crieff (Dornoch Crieff in 1895).
The only one I have not been able to agree/disagree with is Cleveland in England, Tulloch’s book on ‘The Life of Tom Morris’ mentioned him going to extend the course, but have not found any info as yet apart form Tulloch's reference. But to be fair with Tulloch everyone he has mentioned has been proved correct so far.
Yes Huntly is an Old Tom design and is part of the new Old Tom Morris Tournament going round the country which started in Tain last year – it is playing at each course with a connection to Old Tom with Huntly being the host in 2016 - I believe.
There are around 100 courses connected with Old Tom and I am slowly redoing my list which is based upon my research and not on others – errors will no doubt be made but I am getting there.
I can fully understand the confusion on crediting Old Tom with this or that course, but that has arisen due to errors and some poor research. I have read advertisements mentioning Old Tom connection with a course but on actual inspection he just opened the course with no design involvement. Others he surveyed, but we must remember that surveyed in the early days was part and parcel of initial design i.e. is there a potential course on this section of land, hence we get statements that he suggest a 9 or 12 hole course and not a full 18 hole, for that more land was required. I am currently mainly interested in his design intent, from modification (radical or not), to re-design or full original design. Today I was told of two more additional courses that appear to be by Old Tom one new design, the other re-design, but early days - not had a chance to check them out yet. Hopefully my list will clear the air and move the debate forward, however I am reminded by Paul Daley comment in his Feature Interview on GCS that others have taken credit for some of Old Tom’s work. Even with my connection with him I am humbled by the amount of courses he designed, surveyed and opened bearing in mind that the majority was undertaken when he was over 70 years of age in a period when life expectance was between 40-50 years of age. Also remember he did not have our modern transport facility at his disposal.
Sorry, long answer to a short question