I agree with Niall.re on the Valley of Sin
As for TOC rather than knock her out of the running and the emotional conflict you create by doing so (in fact could the R&A live with that from within itself), I not just feel but know the only option if we are want to keep cost down and certainly keep our older course is to finally address the issue. Forget player fitness, courses do not need to be re-designed but clubs and the ball does, no must. Or are you telling me golf is now descended to just the thrill of hitting a long drive, all other challenges fading totally. I firmly believe that we can achieve all the fun and thrill of the game but re booting the equipment to that at the time of the Haskell. It will keep our course in use at minimal cost only requiring a new ball and a new set of clubs. Don't believe me then try playing The Hickory Game to understand the full idea behind the total roll back.
Clearly we can't go on as we are, what the current option build new course through the world, where is the money not to mention land going to come from and at what cost? It’s a no brainer, perhaps that why the R&A have said no roll back of the ball - their lack of brains or I feel it’s more the total lack of understanding the need let alone the urgency.
You may of course not agree and have a different suggestion - if so let’s hear it.
Melvyn