News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Bill Satterfield

  • Karma: +0/-0
Atlanta Athletic Club
« on: May 05, 2010, 03:27:09 PM »
I heading down to Atlanta in a few weeks and am planning on playing both courses at Atlanta Athletic Club.  I'd love to hear some feedback on what you guys think of each course.

Mac Plumart

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Atlanta Athletic Club
« Reply #1 on: May 05, 2010, 04:41:29 PM »
The Highlands starts off like a ball of fire and leads the golfer to believe you are playing a world class classic golf course.  But then it seems to over-do the water hazards and gets a bit awkard during the back half of the front nine.  The back nine is like a totally different course...tight, narrow, short, weird elevation changes, almost goofy golf.

Riverside is a pretty straight forward golf course and pretty nice in my opinion.  It doesn't seem to have that one truly fantastic golf hole, rather it has a collection of solid holes with some interesting shot choices. 

Both courses are usually in great shape with the greens kept very fast and true.  Generally, the pins are tucked into really "interesting" spots which seem to make your approach shots quite interesting.

You should have a great time and I would love to hear your opinions and thoughts on the golf courses.  The club house is quite interesting as well.  All the history associated with the first world class course in Atlanta (of course that was when it was at East Lake, but nevertheless) is cool.

 
Sportsman/Adventure loving golfer.

Link Walsh

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Atlanta Athletic Club
« Reply #2 on: May 05, 2010, 06:47:27 PM »
Most people that I have heard talk about the club like the Riverside course more than Highlands.  In fact, when the club first moved out to Duluth and applied for the U.S. Open (1976 I think?), they were surprised when the USGA came back and awarded it to the Highlands course instead of Riverside.  Highlands went through several redesigns over the years trying to make it "better" until Reese Jones came in before the 2000 PGA to smooth out all the differences between different architectural styles.   

Have fun.  It's already getting pretty hot down here...   

Bill_McBride

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Atlanta Athletic Club
« Reply #3 on: May 05, 2010, 07:17:24 PM »
Jerry Pate has good memories of AAC.

Chris Cupit

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Atlanta Athletic Club
« Reply #4 on: May 05, 2010, 08:43:12 PM »
Most people that I have heard talk about the club like the Riverside course more than Highlands.  In fact, when the club first moved out to Duluth and applied for the U.S. Open (1976 I think?), they were surprised when the USGA came back and awarded it to the Highlands course instead of Riverside.  Highlands went through several redesigns over the years trying to make it "better" until Reese Jones came in before the 2000 PGA to smooth out all the differences between different architectural styles.   

Have fun.  It's already getting pretty hot down here...   

Just prior to his death (I think December, 1971) Bob Jones wrote a letter to the USGA communicating that it would be a great desire for him to see his home club host his favorite championship--the US Open.  (A group of AAC members left the old atlanta location at East Lake and moved the club to Duluth in the earlly 60's--Jones never actually played any of the course at the Duluth location).

The club had 27 holes at the time--an 18 hole course--Riverside and a nine hole course--Highlands.  The club was awarded the 1975 US Open I think and scrambled to build/complete nine holes to "compliment" the other 9 holes at Highlands (for whatever reason the USGA did not want Riverside--maybe too tight for crowds?)

The second nine of highlands was terribly immature and I beleive the club was able to swap dates with Medinah as it ended up hosting the 1976 US Open instead of the '75 Open.  I have pics from the 1976 program and the front side had trees that MAY have been 15 feet tall as well as numerous saplings brought in to try and create some semblance of a wooded feel to match the original highlands nine.  In 1976 it was a huge dichotomy of nines--an extemely long and wide open (except for brutal bermuda rough) course that would be worlds apart from its "back nine".  I think Joe Finger did what is today the front side of Highlands and I would be shocked if it has been re-done less than half a dozen times!  It is VERY long and difficult and the trees have matured nicely.  It was not ready for prime time in 1976 but when you get a letter from Mr. Jones..... ;)

Kenny Baer

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Atlanta Athletic Club
« Reply #5 on: May 05, 2010, 09:56:03 PM »
Funny this thread has appeared as I played there a couple of weeks ago (Highlands) and can't stop thinking about it.

From what I know from some members is that Riverside is preferred 10-1 to Highlands and is getting more than 70% of the play.  The fairways at Highlands are very rough right now and the greens are pretty so so as well, they recently converted to Bermuda.  I was told that it is the only course in the country with Diamond Zoysia fways.  They appeared to not have come in well at all and there is a rumor that they have tons of work to do to get them in good shape. 

IMO, IMO
I played Highlands a couple of weeks ago for the first time since I learned the little I now know about GCA and thought it was pretty piss poor.  The fairways are to narrow and bordered on 90 percent of the holes by extremely deep bunkers on one side and either water or deep bunkers on the other side, the greens are pretty bland as well, at least I don't remember thinking any of them were very good. 

I think the membership must have been pissed about the winning score of the 01 PGA because how I see it there is no way the pros can shoot a good score out there, much less any high digit; or for that matter low digit player.  The recent "remodel" has many design flaws as I see it, the 14th hole has about a 20 yd wide fway with extremely deep bunkers on the right and a tree blocking the approach from the left half, it is just silly, as the preferred angle is from the left.  15 from the back tee measures 260 and is 100 percent carry over water, with as hard as the greens will be in the tournament I can actually see pros laying up as landing a driver or 3 wood, or for that matter a hybrid on the green and not having it roll into the back bunkers from 260 is impossible.  #8 is a 480 yd par 4 with a fway that is as narrow as any I have seen with extremely deep bunkers right and water left, if I was a pro I would seriously consider just blowing it over the bunkers on the right as the fway is just to narrow and intimidating.  To each there own but it is just not my cup of tee as there seems to be little if no strategy as the fairways are to narrow in every instance to have a preferred side.  It has some good holes for sure and it is an amazing place, the letter from Bobby Jones is actually hanging up in the clubhouse and is pretty cool to see.

Riverside is perfectly conditioned right now and IMO a fun golf course; I can see how the members prefer it, I think the 2nd hole is great, the approach is similar to 17 at Congressional.

3 out of 4 of the par 3's on highlands are almost the same, long all carry over water.....they do have pretty stone bordering the water if you like that kind of thing.

Just my opinion and I am no expert.

Tags:
Tags:

An Error Has Occurred!

Call to undefined function theme_linktree()
Back