Lots of good discussion on this, I do have a couple quick thoughts, as well as some answers to questions Patrick directed to me. Thought- one of the key reasons Seminole is so highly regarded is the use of the natural features of the site. It is not just because it seems more natural as a whole, or was just blessed with better land than many courses. Ross just used the features so well. Could we compare it to Dornoch? I am sure someone has somewhere, but the use of a ridge of dunes seems like an apt comparison. So, for many who love golf course architecture, it is very highly regarded.
The other reality about both courses is that the environment of the club and clubhouse do impact many people. They both just feel cool and exclusive but still laid-back. Depending on your experience during your visit, who you were with, etc, it does impact your perspective on the course a bit.
Patrick
1. Calusa does not feel overly manufactured to many first-time visitors. However, if you pay close attention, it is fairly obvious. Quick example- the walk from 8 green to 9 tee does not feel like any walk anywhere in SW Florida.
2. Sorry, would love to take some time to answer this, but it is late. If I have time tomorrow I will.
3. Golly, I hope this does not sound golf course snobbish. But, in our group, the guys who had not played too many top 100 courses liked Calusa as well or better than Seminole, but those who had played many great, classic courses clearly favored Seminole. They loved Calusa, but ranked Seminole higher.