If one is in the middle of the fairway and blocked out by trees, I declare shenanigans!
"Hey Farva, what's that place you like to eat with the mozzarella sticks and all the goofy sh*t on the walls?"
John
What if the fairway is 70 yards wide?
Ciao
I guess it would be easy free me to say, "oh, whoops, I guess I forgot about that one." Indeed, lone trees can occasionally create interesting centerline hazards on holes with enough width. However, I will try to defend my original position. I believe trees have no place as hazards on golf courses. They are fluky (remind me which architect said that) and unexciting. When one is blocked by a tree, one is forced unconditionally to hit a certain type of shot. They limit recovery options and stifle imagination. A bunker, mound, hollow, or even a creek acts as a better centerline hazard for approach shots. A player can still find the green with a well-struck, well-played shot with non-tree hazards. However, if there is a centerline tree to deal with, there is no guarantee that a well-struck and well-played shot will meet with a good result.
I believe a tree's purpose on a golf course is to frame rather than direct golf holes. If a player is forced to deal with a tree, it should be because he has a hit a bad shot outside of the normal playing angles of the golf hole.