I think you guys are making some good points. Adam, I love your expert call in idea. Also, I have one suggestion...and perhaps other might disagree...but it is how I feel. Keep the commentary tilted towards the positive. Not naively positive or Pollyannaish, but here is an example;
Jeff Dawson made a comment that went something like this..."well perhaps Pebble Beach is the weakest course in the rotation now"
Ran follows after a period of obvious hesitatoin and reluctance..."I am not going to pile on Pebble Beach"
Jeff responds..."I didn't mean that Pebble was bad, I meant that MPCC is very good"
The whole thing took quite a long period of time for three sentences and the tone that it seemed to convey was crapping on Pebble and maybe that was or was not the intent. But it seemed like it was for quite awhile (relatively speaking). Why not start off with a comment that praises MPCC for being so good, then say Pebble is ranked the 6th (or 9th) best course in the US and it might be the weak sister of the three courses. I think you say the same thing, but it gives a more positive feeling.
Like I said, both say the same thing...both are honest...but one feels good the other feels petty. Just my 2 cents which of course reflects my outlook on life...which not everyone might share.
I suppose the bottom line is that I love this idea of GCA radio that involves a broadcast with architecutral focus and I want to see it work and prosper.