I always admire Golf Club Atlas's ability to play down and sometimes ridicule the architectural opinions of pro golfers until they praise one of the GCA favorites and then all of a sudden their opinion is respected.
David--
I agree with you in principle; such behavior would be a bit hypocritical of us.
I am always interested in what pros think of golf courses they play on Tour. I don't think it's unfair, though, to disagree when players make sophomoric judgments of golf courses, especially when they are GCA-popular. I also don't think it's unfair to disagree when they make sophomoric praising judgments of courses that are not GCA-popular.
Guys like Ogilvy and Appelby have tended to show a more sophisticated eye for architecture than some of their fellows. I can't recall times when a certain player's compliments about a GCA-unpopular course have been condemned and whose compliments about a GCA-popular course have been praised. I don't know what Appelby or Ogilvy think about many GCA-unpopular courses; I wonder if I'd agree with them.
I've never played MPCC or Pebble Beach or any of those heavyweights, but I have loved what pictures I've seen of the Shore course and I am fascinated by Mike Strantz's courses. I know there are a lot of people here who have played these courses and might be interested in one pro's take on MPCC--especially since it's not an insignificant claim.
Cheers.
--Tim