Who is on the panel? — Golf enthusiasts from all walks; writers, players, superintendents, golf mangers, and even a few architects. If you are interested in being on the panel, just send me an e-mail and a brief summary of yourself and your golf life. At present the panel list is growing, and there is a new emphasis on regional diversity — we are shy in the Southern, Middle, Midwest and Pacific Northwest U.S. — the East, Southwest and Pacific are OK. This does not mean new panel members would not be accepted from the East, Southwest or Pacific — just that these are less a priority now. Also, international panel members are crucial and referrals are appreciated. Canada and Mexico are the current priorities...especially Mexico where we have had a difficult time identifying individuals.
What about holes that no longer exist? — Some of the originators of the site discussed this just last week and we have no issue with NLE holes. I think the Biaarritz would be a terrific edition and it just so happens that I have recently done a fair amount of historical research (even ran it past Bhato!) on the precise location of the original and revised Biarritz in France.
What about legendary holes which still exist but have been altered or lost the features that made them great, or indeed have lost their impact due to changes in technology? — The evaluation criteria allows for this to be put forth prior to the evaluation. Also, panel members may form their opinions on the good and bad that comes with such changes. Since the Hall of Fame is a point in time induction, it is my guess that we will see inductees that perhaps have lost their luster, so to speak — but are still worthy of being included. Once inducted, we have no plans for any golf hole to be removed. We anticipate adding notations and footnotes — that is already provided for in the format.