Wow! Hopefully I haven't missed anyone here.
Brian:
The only question that was asked about the rater was his/her GCA user name, so I don't think reporting rater's location would be possible. An interesting point for discussion, however.
Peter:
Here is a list of courses that would have made the "raw" Top 100 but did not get enough votes:
Remedy Oak, 1 vote, 9.0
Hirono, 4 votes, 8.3
Morfontaine. 6 votes, 8.2
Kawana (Fuji), 4 votes, 7.8
St. Germain, 4 votes, 7.8
Hamilton, 8 votes, 7.6
Ellerston, 2 votes, 7.5
Nanea, 2 votes, 7.5
Mark P:
I will release the rest of the courses but honestly I don't feel like checking each course to see its location and making a new list.
Maybe someone else will take this on.
Kalen:
I may be misunderstanding you here, but the min and max you see on the table are "raw," not adjusted. However, a few "1's" on some of the ballots were omitted as they were likely mistakes or malicious (if anyone really thinks Augusta National is a 1, sorry for deleting your vote). So you are looking at all but the most egregious outliers.
Jim:
I would be glad to send you the raw file (with names omitted of course). I will do that today assuming your e-mail is available for me to see on the board.
To all looking for a printable format and more courses:
Any suggestions on how to make the format better?
One more interesting point:
I believe at the beginning of this project Tom D suggested that a vote of 8 or higher is essentially a vote for a Top 100 course. He appeared concerned that voters without experience would vote too many courses too high. Interestingly, the 100th course on both lists is rated at only 7.4, and there are only 49 courses that received an 8.0 or higher rating in the "raw" rankings. Any thoughts on this?