Architects are like baseball players -- they will hit certain pitches for home runs -- others they may even strike out. I've said this from the beginning of this body slam thread -- no doubt Stephen Kay has not home runs from the various courses -- and I emphasize I have played a very good representative sampling of his original work and those layouts which he was called in to upgrade, restore, call it what one may.
I never said the man is golden across the board. I even said some of his original works were far less than what he is capable in delivering.
However ...
What we have here is an attempt to highlight certain narrow listing of courses - without ever mentioning the fact that other more stellar layouts have been carefully omitted either because the poster has not played them or is hellbent on delivering a point of view that fails to admit that other work has been accepted in a far more positive light. Clearly Kay has talent -- in my mind, and if one were to simply look at ONLY specific courses that have been inserted to make a point irrespective of what the total record demonstrates.
Let's talk about Forsgate -- the 5th hole does have trees there -- however, Kay's charge for the course was a fairly limited one. The trees in question are not in play for 95%+ of those who play the hole. They are far beyond the capabilty of people coming remotely close to them. Highlighting them as an issue is really hellbent on a crusade that boggles my mind.
Let me also point out that Kay recommended widening of a number of fairways at Forsgate and also expanded a number of the greens there. His work at #17 is without doubt in my mind first rate and has only added to the collective greatness of the four par-3's at the layout there.
Chris Schiavone, the head man at Forsgate, understand what courses should be about and his desire to improve Forsgate is well none to those people who have seen the course and what it has faced over the last 30+ years. Forsgate has clearly improved itself and frankly it's important to have a total context on how things were and how things have been improved.
Kelly and John's comments are well said. There are original courses that Kay has done that are quite good -- I have mentioned a few of them -- Scotland Run, Links of ND and The Links at Unionvale, are three that come to mind quickly. Like I said no architect hits home runs all the time -- some do strike out and I think it's high time a far more serious, and clearly more balanced, context be provided.
I've asked if the more noted courses have been played. Have not heard an answer therefore I must conclude they have not been. Some architects no doubt are not suited for the upgrade / restoration elements tied to such projects -- many architects have faced this shortcoming including the likes of Tom Fazio and Rees Jones, to name just two. I guess they would not be among the top 1,000 architects either.