News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


David Stamm

  • Karma: +0/-0
Courses that benefit from their location
« on: November 04, 2009, 10:25:37 PM »
So often there are courses that are described like the following: "If it were somewhere else, it would be lauded." Meaning that because there are so many other quality courses that are in the area, it doesn't get the praise it deserves. Now, let's reverse this. What courses BENEFIT from surrounding the surrounding competition. A course that comes to mind might be Poppy Hills. I don't want to get into debating the merits of Poppy, as we have discussed it many times and I do like the course in general, but I wonder if Poppy would even be known if it weren't in Pebble Beach. What are some others that might fit this criteria?
"The object of golf architecture is to give an intelligent purpose to the striking of a golf ball."- Max Behr

Bill Brightly

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Courses that benefit from their location
« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2009, 10:32:52 PM »
Shinnecock being so close to NGLA?     (Just kidding.)

How about Mid Pines, Southern Pines and Pine Needles?

Ben Sims

  • Karma: +1/-0
Re: Courses that benefit from their location
« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2009, 10:34:03 PM »
Harding Park?

Southampton?

Brentwood CC?

Pure guesses on my part.

Sean_A

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Courses that benefit from their location
« Reply #3 on: November 05, 2009, 03:43:41 AM »
David

Don't all (well, nearly all) of the best courses benefit from their location?  I would have thought that was one of the reasons the locations were chosen in the first place.

Ciao
New plays planned for 2024: Nothing

Mac Plumart

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Courses that benefit from their location
« Reply #4 on: November 05, 2009, 09:04:36 AM »
I've never played them, but what about Whistling Straits and...oh what are the other Dye's called up there?  Anyway, are they all four world class or just one or two?

Sportsman/Adventure loving golfer.

Kalen Braley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Courses that benefit from their location
« Reply #5 on: November 05, 2009, 09:30:36 AM »
Sheep Ranch..

And I will say this to qualify this.  Would anyone travel to the remote coast of Bandon to play this course if the other courses at the Resort weren't there?  ;)

David Stamm

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Courses that benefit from their location
« Reply #6 on: November 05, 2009, 09:54:15 AM »
David

Don't all (well, nearly all) of the best courses benefit from their location?  I would have thought that was one of the reasons the locations were chosen in the first place.

Ciao


Sean, yes. But I'm asking what courses benefit from the other courses that surround it and sort "draft" off of the other courses reputations.
"The object of golf architecture is to give an intelligent purpose to the striking of a golf ball."- Max Behr

Carl Nichols

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Courses that benefit from their location
« Reply #7 on: November 05, 2009, 10:52:24 AM »
Winged Foot East?


Kalen Braley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Courses that benefit from their location
« Reply #8 on: November 05, 2009, 11:03:19 AM »
Friars Head

- Mayday Malone

Matt_Ward

Re: Courses that benefit from their location
« Reply #9 on: November 05, 2009, 11:40:34 AM »
Maidstone

Quaker Ridge

Baltusrol Lower


Jud_T

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Courses that benefit from their location
« Reply #10 on: November 05, 2009, 12:00:59 PM »
Pinehurst 1,3,4,5,6,7,8
Ballybunion new
Whistling Straights Irish

Golf is a game. We play it. Somewhere along the way we took the fun out of it and charged a premium to be punished.- - Ron Sirak

Anthony Gray

Re: Courses that benefit from their location
« Reply #11 on: November 05, 2009, 12:12:00 PM »


  Spyglass


Tiger_Bernhardt

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Courses that benefit from their location
« Reply #12 on: November 05, 2009, 11:11:16 PM »
Lake Merced CC, Cal Club, Harding Park all benifit by the reputation of SFGC and Olyimpic Club Lake.  I think Spyglass greatness transends its neighborhood. Most of the courses in Orlando would be hardpressed to even by heard of if not for Disneyland. I like Pinehurst 1,3,4,5,6,7,8. lol Deal, Princes.

Sean_A

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Courses that benefit from their location
« Reply #13 on: November 06, 2009, 01:57:38 AM »
I would say anything in the Pinehurst area rides the tails of #2. 

Any course near St Andrews rides the tails of TOC. 

Ireland is a bit unusual in that many folks think it can be covered in one or two goes.  So I would say that practically all the courses in Ireland ride the tails Ballybunion, Lahinch, Co Down, Portmarnock and Portrush.  Without those five courses golf tourism in Ireland would be way down. 

Deal and Princes are probably dragged along a bit by Sandwich. 

Ciao
New plays planned for 2024: Nothing

Jamie Barber

Re: Courses that benefit from their location
« Reply #14 on: November 06, 2009, 07:22:57 AM »
Deal and Princes are probably dragged along a bit by Sandwich.  

I take the opposing view, that both would be held in higher regard if they weren't next door to RSG (aka the New at St Andrew's).

How about Gleneagles PGA course? Or some of the lesser St.Andrew's courses? I think these get played because of where they are next to, not entirely on their own merits

Jamie Barber

Re: Courses that benefit from their location
« Reply #15 on: November 06, 2009, 07:30:19 AM »
It wasn't the question exactly, but there are plenty of courses where the course doesn't match the setting (Old Head, Nefyn)

Scott Warren

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Courses that benefit from their location
« Reply #16 on: November 06, 2009, 07:45:02 AM »
To me the OP speaks of un-exciting courses that get trumped up more than they should simply because they are near a great (or many great) course(s). Are you saying Deal fits that mould, Sean?

If so, I'd disagree. I think Deal and Sandwich are a fantastic odd couple.
« Last Edit: November 06, 2009, 07:54:51 AM by Scott Warren »

Jud_T

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Courses that benefit from their location
« Reply #17 on: November 06, 2009, 09:08:29 AM »
I think Pine Needles stands on it's own merit...
Golf is a game. We play it. Somewhere along the way we took the fun out of it and charged a premium to be punished.- - Ron Sirak

Mike Policano

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Courses that benefit from their location
« Reply #18 on: November 06, 2009, 09:45:14 AM »
Essex County Country Club in New Jersey is an excellent course that sits in the shadow of Baltusrol and Plainfield and the greater shadow of the greater New York area.  Many in NJ consider ECCC's back nine to be the second best in NJ. If ECCC was located with less celebrated neighbors, it would be more widely known.

Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +2/-1
Re: Courses that benefit from their location
« Reply #19 on: November 06, 2009, 02:31:59 PM »
I would second the nomination of Spyglass Hill.  No way it's a $300 golf course if Pebble Beach and Cypress Point are not around the corner.

Dan_Callahan

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Courses that benefit from their location
« Reply #20 on: November 06, 2009, 03:15:53 PM »
I would say there's no way Ekwanok would be as exclusive as it is if it wasn't for it's incredible location in downtown Manchester surrounded by the mountains of Vermont.

Sean_A

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Courses that benefit from their location
« Reply #21 on: November 06, 2009, 07:18:01 PM »
Deal and Princes are probably dragged along a bit by Sandwich.  

I take the opposing view, that both would be held in higher regard if they weren't next door to RSG (aka the New at St Andrew's).

How about Gleneagles PGA course? Or some of the lesser St.Andrew's courses? I think these get played because of where they are next to, not entirely on their own merits

Jamie

You could be right about Princes, but I have my doubts.  Folks don't seem to go for the type of course it is - solid golf throughout without many terribly high or low points.  Folks seem to want and expect more flash - I think this is a terrible shame, but none the less, I think Princes can charge that bit extra because of Sandwich.  I can accept that Deal has some special bits to it which raise the quality a bit higher than Princes - though I prefer Princes anyway.  Deal is it is NEVER a £100 course.  They get an extra £25 easy because what is likely the best course in England down the road.  OK, some believe that Deal is in the class of Sandwich, but I think this is so far off the mark its hard to know where to begin.  As evidence of the bolstered status, I don't think Deal is any better better than Rye, in fact I think Rye has its measure, but Rye is cheaper.  Why?  Because there is no Sandwich to drag prices up.  This in no way means Princes or Deal are poor or indifferent courses - only that Sandwich is exceptional - I really mean exceptional.

Ciao
« Last Edit: November 06, 2009, 07:22:17 PM by Sean Arble »
New plays planned for 2024: Nothing

Scott Warren

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Courses that benefit from their location
« Reply #22 on: November 06, 2009, 07:30:38 PM »
But why so fussed with the price they ask, Sean? Is that the measure of a course? Of course not. Royal Wimbledon at 75 pound visitor rate is as much as Nth Berwick and 10 quid more than St Enodoc. Why? because it is in one of the most wealthy and posh corners of th British Isles.

There is so much to do with setting prices that chipping a course on the green fee it asks (and gets plenty of takers...) has, IMO, very little correlation to the qustion at hand - ie. the reputation being over and above what is reasonable based on the nearby options.

I do hope you will get down to play Deal again sooner rather than later. I mean no disrespect to Princes (which, incidentally at 80 quid/40 quid for a visitor/guest is either a bit cheaper or a bit more expensive than Deal depending whether you have a member with you or not), but that you say you prefer Princes to Deal, to me, suggsts your memories of Deal must surely be hazy.

I do agree Deal is not in Sandwich's class. I am still shaking my head at how thoroughly my mind got blown at Sandwich during Buda. I am gutted I missed the two courtesies immediately after that Mark C played in. Truly, I'd give Sandwich a 7-3 10RS against anything I have ever played. It is a seriously amazing golf course.
« Last Edit: November 06, 2009, 07:35:50 PM by Scott Warren »

Sean_A

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Courses that benefit from their location
« Reply #23 on: November 06, 2009, 08:03:30 PM »
But why so fussed with the price they ask, Sean? Is that the measure of a course? Of course not. Royal Wimbledon at 75 pound visitor rate is as much as Nth Berwick and 10 quid more than St Enodoc. Why? because it is in one of the most wealthy and posh corners of th British Isles.

There is so much to do with setting prices that chipping a course on the green fee it asks (and gets plenty of takers...) has, IMO, very little correlation to the qustion at hand - ie. the reputation being over and above what is reasonable based on the nearby options.

I do hope you will get down to play Deal again sooner rather than later. I mean no disrespect to Princes (which, incidentally at 80 quid/40 quid for a visitor/guest is either a bit cheaper or a bit more expensive than Deal depending whether you have a member with you or not), but that you say you prefer Princes to Deal, to me, suggsts your memories of Deal must surely be hazy.

I do agree Deal is not in Sandwich's class. I am still shaking my head at how thoroughly my mind got blown at Sandwich during Buda. I am gutted I missed the two courtesies immediately after that Mark C played in. Truly, I'd give Sandwich a 7-3 10RS against anything I have ever played. It is a seriously amazing golf course.

Scott

You know my take - I am looking for value, fun and quality.  It may be a cop out, but I just don't know enough about architecture and that many courses to call which are better and why.  I tend to go for groupings of class and within that class it doesn't really matter if some folks think one is better than another because its down to opinion.  By the same token, if I think two courses are in the same quality class and one costs twice as much as the other I ask why.  Most often its down to me being wrong about the courses being grouped in the same class for whatever reason or a course charges too much money and this would adversely effect my willingness to return.  There are just too many good courses out there to pay over the odds.  I think I am well known for generally not praising Open courses for two reasons.  I think they tend to be over-priced and there are loads of other courses just as good in terms of fun and quality.  There are several Open courses I wouldn't walk up the street to play for the price they ask - they just aren't that good when I look at the big picture of whats available.   

Ciao

New plays planned for 2024: Nothing

mike_beene

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Courses that benefit from their location
« Reply #24 on: November 06, 2009, 10:47:01 PM »
Torrey Pines

Tags:
Tags:

An Error Has Occurred!

Call to undefined function theme_linktree()
Back