I had the opportunity to play The Quarry here in Naples yesterday. This was my first Hurdzan/Fry course and given the reputation that Calusa Pines -another Hudrzan/Fry effort down here - has (which is basically across the street from The Quarry), I had relatively high expectations.
Generally, I don't particularly care for "Florida Golf." Many of the courses are "target" golf and the strategy is usually dictated by which side of the hole the water is on. Unfortunately, The Quarry provided much of the same. If I had to sum this course up in one word, that word would be "Typical". Although there was a bit more movement in the fairways than I generally see, I felt it more than a bit contrived. The greens were large, and had a lot of movement on the perimeter but many of them lacked internal movement.
Each hole had water on it and the only variation from hole to hole was which side the water was on (see here
http://glatq.memberstatements.com/tour/tours.cfm?tourid=50199). The course gets its name from being built on a former limestone quarry so water was expected but still, this was a bit much.... Standing on the 7th green I said to one of my playing partners "the course is in great shape but I feel like I'm playing the same hole over and over again."
I will say, however, that while the greens did not provide much interest, the surrounds did provide for a variety of shots and many of the greens had false fronts or fell off on one side or the other.
Here are some pictures:
The 1st hole tee shot:
The 1st hole approach:
The 3rd tee (water on the left again):
The 3rd green ("pancake"):
The 4th approach (water on the right this time):
You're starting to get the picture so I'll fast forward to the obligatory Florida "peninsula" par 3 over water:
Finally, the 18th tee (water on the right and left!):
Im not sure how much this course is reflective of Hurdzan/Fry generally as I understand Calusa Pines is much better and fits in with the land it was built on. Part of the problem with this project could have been that the residential development was restricting the land. And who knows, the development company (Centex) could have asked for water on every hole as part of this community's marketing is that it is "lake front living" in Florida. Regardless, this is your typical former swamp built up with a bunch of artificial mounding with water on every hole. I can see how they could do good work but I think this shows how hard it is to create something from nothing and not make it seem manufactured.