News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Sean_A

  • Karma: +0/-0
Pressing PRESTBURY GC New
« on: October 16, 2009, 08:56:33 PM »
I had the good fortune to make my way up to Cheshire and play Prestbury after a 15 year break.  I must admit to knowing very little of the course other than Colt is the architect of record and that Morrison may have helped with the design at some stage. There is also scuttlebutt that Dr Mac was involved due to a newspaper article which claimed this to be the case. Although, I don't recall Dr Mac claiming credit in any of his literature.

The course sits on a very hilly property not far south of Manchester near Macclesfield, in a tony neighbourhood. In truth, the course is likely a bit too mountainous for ideal golf, but Colt dealt with the severity of the terrain admirably.  The card tells us the total yardage from the daily tees is not much shy of 6200, but as is so often the case with Colt's work the course can play longer.  I find Prestbury a fairly difficult test despite not having many onerous requirements. Finally, I am greatly impressed with the many boozer loops which can be played on this compressed design.

Plan of the course.


We get a sense of scorecard length not meaning much on the first hole, a short par 5 of 459 yards, but one which takes two very good swipes to reach the green. Two decent shots leaves a wedge in the hand, but judging the depth of the green is difficult.


#2 takes the golfer down hill between more equi-distant bunkers right and left.  The green seems as though it is propped up from the rear.  Missing the putting surface leads to serious trouble. Below is a look at the recovery from the high right side of the green.


The course says hello on the third.  If one is long enough the drive is blind with a landing zone slipping sharply away from the crest of a hill. Below is the approach from the left side of the fairway to a magnificent green site tagged to a rapidly rising hill. Trees behind the green to the right, toward the 4th tee have been removed. There is some very dubious cut patterns which distract from the quality of the hole.


Playing sharply downhill, the 4th is a mid-length one-shotter. 


An old photo of the green. Looks to me like the green is much smaller these days. It is also clear that Prestbury has immense work ahead if it is to recreate the interior views which once existed.


The fifth is a short par 4 that is reachable in theory, but I am sure the photo explains why it isn't in reality.  I reckon its better to lay back off the tee leaving the length of the green available for the approach. That said, the layup isn't easy. The fairway shy of the left bunker drops left to leave a blind approach.


Beyond the bunker is the place to be. There used to be steps where the bunker is located.


The steepness of the bank is difficult to appreciate in photos.


Other than the orientation of the approach, the 5th is distinguished from the 3rd by a bunker above the green.  I believe sand used to completely surround this green. From the 6th tee it is apparent why driving pin high isn't clever. 


I don't quite know how Colt managed it, but the second three-shotter, #6, is another that should be reachable on the card, but it plays longer than its listed 496 yards. The second climbs the hill and crosses the entrance road.  However, it is the turning left of the hole which makes it difficult to get up in two.  I don't know the function of the immediate tree on the right. From the back tee it forces drives left.




The hilly nature of the course hides the fact that Prestbury is compact.  The seventh is another good short hole. The 6th green is in the immediate foreground.  Another tree to the left...why? The rough shy of the dip looks lovely, but it may conceal the dramatic impact of the hole.


Below are closer looks at the green and its hidden surprise.




I think this is an old version the hole, although the green looks to be tilted the wrong way.


The 8th is an odd short two-shotter which bends hard left and would be drivable for the flat bellies except for the trees guarding the left corner (and I suspect the 7th tee).  This is a curious hole because one must challenge the unseen hazard through the fairway to gain the best angle of approach. The course feels awkward in this area. I wonder if a hole isn't original.

The side finishes with a hole of monster proportions.  At 455 yards and climbing about 50 feet to the highest point of the course for the approach, the ninth is a hole which will require a deft short game for most to earn a par. The bunkering at the turn of the dogleg has been changed. More importantly, why are there so many trees blocking the view down the valley?


On the whole the bunkers are well placed and attractive. From here my well struck 4 wood came up miles short of the target. The greens at Prestbury are typical Colt if there is such a thing. Nothing flashy, but often beguiling. That said, Colt was not adverse to the odd adventurous green as the three tier green demonstrates; it majestically caps this harsh hole.


An old photo of the the uphill approach from a position further back.


I know little of the science of course routing, but Prestbury strikes me as one of outstanding merit.  The back nine is routed around the front in a sort of horse shoe fashion. Interestingly, the back nine covers the highest part of the property at the 10th tee and lowest part at #12 green with an ease few architects could match.  While the walk back up to the clubhouse involves some gentle climbing it never requires a long green to tee walk.

Totally transformed by new bunkering, the 10th is a deceiving knob to knob hole with a rather narrow green and well protected by sand left and right.  Perhaps the green complex is a little too similar to the 8th, but it isn't a bad hole for that.  Folks may be wondering why the course is so green. It is my impression that Manchester has not been spared the rain England has been deluged by this year. In any case, given the severity of the land, I am not sure keen conditions would be the most suitable.   


The final par 5 could be Prestbury's best. Trees are a serious issue around the tee and for the drive. The tee shot requires a long and accurate strike to the left side of the fairway to reach the turn of the dogleg and avoid trrees.  Anything too long on this line will run down to a wood.  Anything terribly far right of this line makes going for the green in two an arduous task due to trees guarding the inside of the dogleg. 

The 12th is visually odd from the tee.  We must hit over a garden hedge and shape the shot left to right to earn a good angle of approach.  Other than trees, obscured visuals from the tee or out and out blindness is perhaps Prestbury's biggest weakness.  The site is lovely yet it often feels like one isn't afforded the views even thought there are usually consequences for not hitting the mark. For sure the construction date explains some of the tee shots. Thankfully, the hole improves immeasurably due to the approach.  The golfer's first glimpse of a green is the 15th in the background. I thought this was the intended target until walking further up the fairway.  I stated earlier that this green is the low part of the course and because of this the club recently carried out extensive drainage work. 


While the slight uphill drive for number 13 is less than ideal, we are treated to one of the highlights of Prestbury for the approach. 


The use of hills at Prestbury reminded me of my younger days playing a Ross gem, Grosse Ile, and the delightful 14th was like going home. The player may have the choice of driving over the knob to the valley floor for a flick wedge approach at the risk of catching a downhill lie to an uphill green.  Alternatively, one can play for the top of the knob and be further back, but have a level lie to a green on more less the same elevation.  My thoughts on this matter are undoubtably influenced by the situation of the tee shot because we stand at a marvelous confluence of holes.  Like Ross often did, Colt demonstrates a remarkable economy of design.  The 13th, 16th, 17th and 1st greens and 14, 17 and 18th tees all nearby. Tee shot for 14.


The lovely approach to #14.  Notice how the left edge of the green flows up to the medal tee for #15. Unfortunately, that tee seems to be abandoned. Prestbury is packed with little details which help distinguish the course as true Colt gem.


Trees crowd the 15th to protect the road on the left. For the life of me I can't understand why trees are used so harshly on the right if the safety issue is on the left. The tree spoil what is a good short two-shotter. The green slides away down the hill beyond and the cross bunker effectively hides the landing zone for the approach unless one can hit a very long drive.


A closer look at the green.


We now turn back for home and play the only bunker free hole on the course.  The 16th isn't a terribly long par 4, but positioning is crucial. Anything down the left leaves a severe side-hill lie.  If one manages to hit the fairway a magnificent opportunity to use the terrain is evident. One can play short and right and let the slope turn the ball to the hole. The fairway is broken by rough...below is the difficult approach. Should the player misjudge the pace, a scar hollow to the right awaits.  This is without a doubt one of the cleverest of Colt holes I have come across. 


Knowing how skilled Colt was at creating endearing par 3s, perhaps my expectations are too high, but up to now the short holes have been good without being memorable.  The entire putting surface can't be seen from the tee as it curls right around the bunker. In wet conditions, I think it is entirely possible to hit a spinning shot to the false front section of the green and watch it spin a considerable distance back down the bank. 


Looking back to the tee and 16th green.


The home hole is slightly disappointing, but that is likely due to the collection of creativity experienced during the previous three or four hours. That said, this hole does take some playing as the two tier green is deceptively deep and well protected by sand. 




Because the terrain at Prestbury is unruly and it therefore seems to me there may be some playability issues if the course were keen it is difficult to give it a 1*.  That said, I would like to go back and see the course when it is drier because my fears may be unfounded. In any case, because there are so many compelling holes such as 3, 5, 7, 9, 14 & 16 I have a lot of time for Prestbury and anybody traveling through the area should strongly consider giving it a go.  One final word, the more Colt courses I play the more I realize the importance of turf quality.  I can find no discernible differences in the design quality of Prestbury compared to Colt's more famous heathland courses.  What is, however, very noticeable, is the difference in turf quality between parkland and heathland golf.    2024
 
Ciao
« Last Edit: September 11, 2024, 04:03:28 AM by Sean_A »
New plays planned for 2024: Nothing

Tom MacWood

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: PRESTBURY: Just a Taster
« Reply #1 on: October 16, 2009, 09:52:51 PM »
Sean
Wow. Wasn't this course one of Colt's most heavily bunkered? Do you think it is better now or then?

Sean_A

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: PRESTBURY: Just a Taster
« Reply #2 on: October 17, 2009, 06:49:12 AM »
Sean
Wow. Wasn't this course one of Colt's most heavily bunkered? Do you think it is better now or then?

Tommy Mac

I really don't know the relative bunker numbers for Colt courses.  I suspect Prestbury has in the region of 65 pits and predictably, several could be removed without disrupting the design in the least. 

I don't have any idea of what the course was like 85 years ago though I suspect there were fewer trees which would have added to the illusion of space even though the course is compact. 

Ciao
New plays planned for 2024: Nothing

Cristian

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: PRESTBURY: Colt in the Hills
« Reply #3 on: October 17, 2009, 07:45:55 AM »
Wonderful series of pics as always!

A very nice looking course. The only thing that makes me wonder is the symmetric bunkering of the first fairway. The bunkers look to be at similar distance from the tee, unusual I think for anything I have seen from Colt. Is it possible that one of the bunkers is not original? or is there another explanation?

Other than that it is a course begging to be played! Is the course easy to access and do they welcome visitors at weekends?


Sean_A

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: PRESTBURY: Colt in the Hills
« Reply #4 on: October 17, 2009, 08:05:55 AM »
Cristian

Yes, the opening two holes have unimaginative fairway bunkering for the tee shot, but I don't know if that is down to Colt or not.

Thank you for the kind words.  I am not terribly familiar with Cheshire clubs, but I suspect that no weekend visitors are allowed.

Ciao
New plays planned for 2024: Nothing

Paul_Turner

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: PRESTBURY: Colt in the Hills
« Reply #5 on: October 17, 2009, 03:18:38 PM »
Sean I've added some old photo to Mark's thread, including the 5th and the "White Cliffs of Dover"

Tom

I think you may be thinking of Tandridge...that's where he went nuts with bunker:  about 280 I've heard and on a undulating site too.  Prestbury has definitely had quite a few filled but wasn't nearly as heavily bunkered as Tandridge. 
can't get to heaven with a three chord song

Sean_A

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: PRESTBURY: Colt in the Hills
« Reply #6 on: October 17, 2009, 05:37:31 PM »
Sean I've added some old photo to Mark's thread, including the 5th and the "White Cliffs of Dover"

Tom

I think you may be thinking of Tandridge...that's where he went nuts with bunker:  about 280 I've heard and on a undulating site too.  Prestbury has definitely had quite a few filled but wasn't nearly as heavily bunkered as Tandridge.  

Paul

What stands out most about the pix you posted are the lack of trees and and houses.  

The hill that #5 and #3 (and the one #9 climbs) looks to have very few trees on it if the pix below are anything to go by.





Looking at #4 the houses on the distance hills haven't been built yet.  Looking at the current green I couldn't help thinking that it may have extended further left at one time, but judging from this pic it looks like the green used to actually curl toward the front bunker which no longer exists - I suspect it may be much reduced and/or pushed back more toward the rear right bunker.  If I am correct this looks to be a fascinating complex and much more interesting than the current set up.


Also, the 7th looks to have a guardian tree to the right and encroaching trees left!


Additionally, the scale of the 5th green seems far larger back in the day though I must admit to preferring the current precision approach required today and the cleaner look of no bunkers below the green.  I have to say, that all of the bunkers shown on #5 look like they would have been a nightmare to maintain because of the severe slopes they rest on with the amount of rain this part of the country reputedly gets.  It is not surprising they have been removed.  

Do you have more pix?

Ciao
« Last Edit: October 17, 2009, 05:50:45 PM by Sean Arble »
New plays planned for 2024: Nothing

Dan Dingman

Re: PRESTBURY: Colt in the Hills
« Reply #7 on: October 17, 2009, 05:47:31 PM »
Sean,

Nice job. The pictures you took show a very nice piece of land. The back 9 appeared to be more open. Is this the case?

The fifth hole looks similar to the 1st at Orchard Lake CC.

DD

Sean_A

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: PRESTBURY: Colt in the Hills
« Reply #8 on: October 17, 2009, 06:00:19 PM »
Sean,

Nice job. The pictures you took show a very nice piece of land. The back 9 appeared to be more open. Is this the case?

The fifth hole looks similar to the 1st at Orchard Lake CC.

DD

Dan

You are right, there are similarities (if memory serves me correctly) between OLCC's 1st and the Prestbury's 5th.

The trees only come into play on a few holes and at least on one hole, the par 5 11th, that tree was intentionally left there by Morrison despite some members grumbling back in the day.  In fact, the only hole I didn't like the trees at all was on #15.  That drive felt different from the remainder of the course.  I should also mention that the trees above #3 are atrocious.  To block light from that green is silly especially as the trees don't really add anything.  

I went back to Creating Classics and noticed that Morrison was defending the 10th green site with no bunkers.  Now there are at least three guarding what is already a narrow target.  

Ciao  
« Last Edit: October 18, 2009, 02:59:23 AM by Sean Arble »
New plays planned for 2024: Nothing

Paul_Turner

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: PRESTBURY: Colt in the Hills
« Reply #9 on: October 17, 2009, 08:33:41 PM »


Dan

I went back to Creating Classics and noticed that Morrison was defending the green site with no bunkers.  Now there are at least three guarding what is already a narrow target. 

Ciao   
[/quote]

Sean
I assume you mean no bunkers above the green (there are bunkers below).

Apart from the first b&w photo I posted, the b&w photos posted above, and in Creating Classics, are from before Morrison joined the firm (the design may have involved some input from Mackenzie).  For the 5th,  Colt put bunkers below the green,  Morrison then added some high above on the bank at some later date.  These were both lost at some point and the current arrangement was established.

I agree those bunkers could have been difficult to maintain; there's an aerial in the club history from the 1970s and they may have still been there, but it's difficult to make out.  But I'd like to have tried that recovery shot from Morrison's bunkers above the hole!  From the modern photos it looks like clearing the trees above the green would be worthwhile.  Recovery shots from the old grass depressions where the traps used to be?

The 1970s aerial is amazingly open compared with today.  But at least the club had the good sense to plant the trees in copses rather than straight lines.

Creating Classics does shed some light on how the firm tended the course through the years.  They note that Colt was advising in 1934,5,6,7.  Then in 1949 in F Hawtrees bio "Colt and Co", Morrison mentions that he has been advising the course every two or three years for some time and this is supported in Creating Classics which has some minuted details...he may have redone the 10th.

I'd forgotten where that photo of the 5th with the Morrison bunkers had come from...but I just realised that it's from 'Colt and Co" and the text below states that he added the upper bunkers in 1926.  I'm assuming it's accurate (but there's lots of mistakes in both books).

Add some more vintage pics soon.
can't get to heaven with a three chord song

Paul_Turner

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: PRESTBURY: Colt in the Hills
« Reply #10 on: October 17, 2009, 08:37:30 PM »
PS

I think Prestbury must be Colt's hilliest layout.  He had some bold land on other courses but I can't think of anything.  It looks even hillier than Hamilton.  The only possible other contenders I can think of are Madrid and Pedrena (Seve's home course)....our fellow GCAer Alfonso may be able to decide.

Sean

Which do you prefer, Harborne or Prestbury?
can't get to heaven with a three chord song

Sean_A

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: PRESTBURY: Colt in the Hills
« Reply #11 on: October 18, 2009, 03:11:53 AM »
Paul

I forgot to mention the 10th as the hole Morrison was advocating no bunkers necessary - you may have been thinking I was talking about the 5th.  I can understand the lower bunkers being there just to stop balls running to god knows where, but I think Morrison is definitely right about the high bunker - its not very stylish either. 

I don't think there is anything to choose between Harborne and Prestbury - both are very good courses with imaginative holes scattered throughout.  Prestbury has the advantage of a very hilly property creating some dramatic holes (probably more really good holes than Harborne), but those same hills also make walking some of the holes less than they could be on a flatter property.  Harborne has ideal elevation changes, but it doesn't have as many dramatic holes.  I think Prestbury really is a routing masterpiece and probably the better course, but even so, at the moment, I would plop for Harborne if only because its a better walk.  That said, I would like to see Prestbury when its properly dry.  If the playablity holds up, I think I would plop for it over Harborne.   

I look forward to more pix. 

Ciao
New plays planned for 2024: Nothing

James Boon

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: PRESTBURY: Colt in the Hills
« Reply #12 on: October 18, 2009, 05:42:48 AM »
Sean,

Thanks for these pictures. Wish I could have joined you.

I like the look of the setting of the 3rd and 5th greens, and the 9th looks a cracker up the hill! Some other really good looking holes also, but the thing which jumped out at me from the photos was the par 3s. I always think of Colt putting together a very good set of 3s on any of his courses I've played, but these look to be okay rather than very good. What did you think?

Cheers,

James
2023 Highlights: Hollinwell, Brora, Parkstone, Cavendish, Hallamshire, Sandmoor, Moortown, Elie, Crail, St Andrews (Himalayas & Eden), Chantilly, M, Hardelot Les Pins

"It celebrates the unadulterated pleasure of being in a dialogue with nature while knocking a ball round on foot." Richard Pennell

Philip Gawith

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: PRESTBURY: Colt in the Hills
« Reply #13 on: October 18, 2009, 07:38:53 AM »
Thansk for the tour Sean. I was up at Wimslow with Mark last weekend and he took time off to show me a few holes at Prestbury - I hope he chips in! You  have made it even more enticing. Apparently it is Wayne Rooney-land - sorry to lower the tone!

Sean_A

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: PRESTBURY: Colt in the Hills
« Reply #14 on: October 19, 2009, 04:45:42 AM »
Sean,

Thanks for these pictures. Wish I could have joined you.

I like the look of the setting of the 3rd and 5th greens, and the 9th looks a cracker up the hill! Some other really good looking holes also, but the thing which jumped out at me from the photos was the par 3s. I always think of Colt putting together a very good set of 3s on any of his courses I've played, but these look to be okay rather than very good. What did you think?

Cheers,

James

James

As I stated in the review I wasn't bowled over by the par 3s, but all are good without being remarkable with the exception of 17 which is outstanding.  That said, from the ld pix it looks like #4 used to be a better hole.

The 9th certainly has wow factor and offers a compelling choice of shots off the tee, but the land is far too steep (if going uphill anyway) to be anything close to ideal.  Though I imagine back in the day it may have been a par 5.  I spose this is another case of why I like the bogey system better than par. 

Ciao
New plays planned for 2024: Nothing

Tommy Williamsen

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: PRESTBURY: Colt in the Hills
« Reply #15 on: October 19, 2009, 10:13:10 PM »
Sean, I played Prestbury with Mark a few years ago. I thought it was exceptional.  I posted more thoughts on Mark's thread.  Glad you got to play it.
Where there is no love, put love; there you will find love.
St. John of the Cross

"Deep within your soul-space is a magnificent cathedral where you are sweet beyond telling." Rumi

Sean_A

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: PRESTBURY: Colt in the Hills
« Reply #16 on: October 22, 2009, 01:17:46 PM »
Paul

I was still hoping that you would post those vintage pix!?!?

Ciao
New plays planned for 2024: Nothing

Paul_Turner

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: PRESTBURY: Colt in the Hills
« Reply #17 on: October 22, 2009, 02:13:26 PM »
Sean

I hadn't forgotten you, here they are.

The 10th.  With fronting bunker and bunker close up.  Interestingly Morrison advises in 1949 to add a top shot bunker, I assume restoring something similar to that one in the foreground.




13th green complex with mounding




14th tee shot.  I suspect you won't be a fan of that trap Sean


16th green looking back from 17

1st bunker

3rd green

the 4th which is the same as in Creating Classics.  Looks larger and perhaps more contoured to me.  Is the "kicker" bank on the left still in play?
can't get to heaven with a three chord song

Sean_A

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: PRESTBURY: Colt in the Hills
« Reply #18 on: October 22, 2009, 02:35:35 PM »
Paul

Cheers!  Where to begin?  

#10, yes, Morrison was advocating replacing the cross bunker short of the green,, but not having any green-side bunkers.  I think he was spot on assuming the course was f&f.

This pic of #14 is from a different angle than now.  Was it taken from the 17th green?  If this was from the tee it must have wrapped near the 17th green because this shot is playing toward oob left rather than along it.  I kind of like it.  



Look at the 16th green - its square!!!  I don't see a tee for #17 unless its squished between the bunker and right edge of the 6th green.  


Yes, I said before that #4 looks to be radically different today than in the old pix.  The green looks to be vastly larger and wrapping around more between the right bunkers.  I thought the hole looked odd when I stood on the tee, but I suspected it used to continue on its way past the left bunkers.  That kick in from the rear left has been softened big time.  

Thanks for posting - its always great to see quality pix of old Colt courses.

Ciao


« Last Edit: October 22, 2009, 07:04:07 PM by Sean Arble »
New plays planned for 2024: Nothing

Paul_Turner

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: PRESTBURY: Colt in the Hills
« Reply #19 on: October 22, 2009, 03:29:31 PM »
Sean the photos are from Colt's own collection and must be from the time of construction.  The course isn't quite finished in some of the pics. Perhaps they hadn't built the 17th tee yet?

The 16th green still looks pretty "square" from certain viewpoints.  But probably shrunken


From the club's website.
can't get to heaven with a three chord song

Sean_A

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: PRESTBURY: Colt in the Hills
« Reply #20 on: October 22, 2009, 07:15:13 PM »
Sean the photos are from Colt's own collection and must be from the time of construction.  The course isn't quite finished in some of the pics. Perhaps they hadn't built the 17th tee yet?

The 16th green still looks pretty "square" from certain viewpoints.  But probably shrunken

Paul

I see what you are saying about #17 green, but it isn't square and the old one looks very square.  All the corners have been softened.  I suspected that the right hollow was a bunker, but I can't see sand in the old pic, bad angle.  I rather suspect the front left of the green has been extended out beyond the original pad which has eliminated that square look.  No matter what has been done, this is one heck of a hole - I think probably the best on the course.

Ciao
« Last Edit: July 23, 2024, 05:30:50 PM by Sean_A »
New plays planned for 2024: Nothing

Sean_A

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Pressing PRESTBURY GC
« Reply #21 on: July 23, 2024, 06:02:29 PM »
Its been a 15 year hiatus, but memories of Prestbury drew me back for another game. Gosh, there is a load of good golf here. Prestbury is easily part of the conversation of best 100 in England...high praise I know. Please see the updated tour.


Ciao
New plays planned for 2024: Nothing

Thomas Dai

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Pressing PRESTBURY GC
« Reply #22 on: July 24, 2024, 03:16:11 AM »
Thanks for this. Can’t comment on the course itself and I’m not usually too fussed about visuals and conditioning but the amount and variation between stripes and zig-zags and maybe some hand-mown approaches is a surprise. Maybe it’s the nature of the terrain but visually the mowing appears ‘unusual’?
Atb

John Mayhugh

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Pressing PRESTBURY GC
« Reply #23 on: July 25, 2024, 07:39:22 AM »
Your update reminds me I still need to see this course.

I'm with Dai - the mowing patterns look odd. But the land looks good.

Sean_A

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Pressing PRESTBURY GC
« Reply #24 on: July 31, 2024, 07:31:23 PM »
Your update reminds me I still need to see this course.

I'm with Dai - the mowing patterns look odd. But the land looks good.


Prestbury is a classy design in need of fresh eyes. I like it, but it’s really a trip filler type course. Don’t drive miles out of your way for a game unless invited.

Ciao
« Last Edit: August 03, 2024, 11:23:09 PM by Sean_A »
New plays planned for 2024: Nothing