More replies, and just remember that if I am not responding to anyone's post it is only because the writer has not asked me a question (and that includes you, Tiger!).
George
There is not enough hard data (ie.e comparable scores) to tell how different Dornoch is playing in 2009 than in previous years. I base my statement that the course is "easier" on my own observations and the opinions of others who known Dornoch well. The gorse removal also makes you think less and reduces strategic options on several holes. It also diminishes the beauty of the course. One good thiing is that I think they may have uncovered the original site of Old Tom Morris' tee for what is now the 14th (Foxy).
I am keeping my mind open, however, and look forward to seeing what the place looks like and plays like next May, when the gorse (or what's remaining of it) will be in full bloom.
RJ
1. I've pretty much switched over to the Limey way of spelling things (e.g. "-ise" for "-ize") just for convenience, as most of my correspondence is with people over here.
2. As to courses which are palimpsests (i.e. ground over which different courses have been designed), the only one I know well enough to be able to visualise the old holes beneath the new ones is Dornoch, and it is a pretty good example. I'd guess that Muirfield and Royal County Down would be other good examples.
3. As for the NHS, I'm not covered outside the UK (except for EU countries, which have a reciprocal kind of deal). As for travel to countries with third-world health care systems I, like most people living here, purchase insurance annually for a nominal fee (no more than $200/year for a family of four) which covers us for any medical care outsdie the EU, up to and including being flown back to the UK in a medically equipped and staffed private jet for serious injuries or conditions (I am not making this up!).
Rick
I was thinking of finishing my own D-list novel and selling the rights to Hollywood for $$$millions. Am I being overly ambitious? Otherwise, having a pension and a working wife helps.
Dan K
1. Darwin is the only golf writer that passes the Mucci test (i.e. once you finish one of his articles you want to go back and read it again). The only other golf writers I can think of who I actually do happily re-read are Longhurst, Wodehouse, Cooke, Murphy and Haultain. I don't know of any contemporary golf writer who comes close to these, but I really haven't read much here either. None of these (including Darwin) is anywhere near 3*** when it comes to the world of letters. Bernie might make 1* in my universe.
2. I would like to write something that would be read and that more than just a few people would gladly pay for.
George
You could have asked Gib because he would be almost sure to send you an intgeresting reply. Using the search engine is so 21st century......
Bill
1. My favorite hole at Stanford is 13th. I like the old fashioned cross bunker (which was still very much in play in the 1960's), the narrowing of the fairway in the driving zone, and the slight elevation of the green which makes it a visually pleasing as well as a challenging 2nd shot.
2. I like the 12th the way it is, although I haven't played down the right off the tee there for 20+ years (poor execution rather than choice). If that (great) route leads to a tree-clogged 2nd shot I'd vote for the chain saw.
3. Nothing will ever assuage the disappointment I feel that the old 4th (60s-70s version) is no more. When I get to that corner now it's like getting to the Donald Steel holes on he Eden at St. Andrews--no matter how good or bad the holes are I just play them numbly until I finally get back to the real golf course.
4. Many times, as I was playing with my Uncle's old hickory woods in the 60's.
Sean
Most of my iconoclastic opinions on the "greats" have been posted here before, and as I said above, they are all tentative and very much subject to change on repeat play, but here's today's (14 October 2009) list of possible anomalies if you've not read all my 10,000+ posts carefully.....
My 3*** others rate lower--Castle Stuart; Kingston Heath
My 2** others rate lower--Applebrook; Littlestone; Winchester
My 2** others rate higher--NGLA; Old Course; Pacific Dunes; Pinehurst #2; Portmarnock; Royal Melbourne (West)
My 1* others rate higher--Cruden Bay; Nairn; North Berwick; Rye; Swinley Forest
PS--if your next question is going to be "Why?" my answers will probably be, "Because, to me, they fit better in that group than any other") in most if not all cases.
Thanks all for your questions and thoughts
Rich