Bill
Thanks Bill, ‘really contentious’, I see, well consistent if nothing else I hope...
However, I prefer to raise the issues and question why a ‘Cult of Laziness’ was allowed to infect the game of golf as it has. The introduction of the cart and even worst still, the cart track should be described as nothing less than total collateral damage not just to our courses but the real identity of our game of golf.
The whole game has been contaminated by its introduction. Don’t see it or believe it then look to the type of courses it has spawned:-
Courses on housing developments with the introduction of long Green to Tee distances.
Courses built in sites not suitable for the game
Cart Balling courses
Old & New Courses scarred with tracks to minimise wear and tear on the course.
For me the worst of all offences against the Game of Golf is allowing 'No Walking Courses' and having the cheek to still call the game golf.
Thank God, some are starting to stand up against the cart and No Walking courses, but it should never have been allowed to get to this position.
I am against the cart, but the laws of the game allow them and I have no power to do anything but keep raising the issue. This issue, IMHO is most fundamental to the future of the game, it dictates the design of courses, the location of courses, the very nature of the courses and how the game is to be played. If we had carts in the old days we may never have had the great courses or their designers, something worth thinking about when we try and judge modern architects perhaps.
Those who just play the game care not for the actual game, their enjoyment comes from doing it their way, or getting a low score. Many others have a deeper connection to the game and want to keep it as it has been played over the centuries.
What will happen, will it in the final analyses be down to money, health or the Devil may care attitude that seems to embrace our modern world. Who knows?
Bill ‘‘really contentious’, yes I suppose you are right, want to help?
Melvyn
PS Dónal, This is not an argument but just an opinion. I expect it will not attract any attention as just a response to Bill's comment