Some more thoughts , based on the above contributions and further reflection:
1. There should be one BUDA every year, playing for the Cup itself, in roughly Ryder Cup format, and in Europe.
2. This event should focus on camaraderie and discovery, i.e. "new" courses every year (even though this was violated this year with Deal getting a second bite at the cherry, and Littlestone offerring a nearly full participant avant-event). Architecture should be a vibrant subtext to the event rather than the raison d'etre.
3. There are clearly multiple great venues for future BUDAs, in 2010 and beyond.
That being said:
4. The earlier BUDAs (Dornoch, Painswick) had relatively strong participation from actual rather than virtual golf course architects. As best I can recall, at the former were Kelly Blake Moran, Brian Phillips and Ronan Branigan. At the latter were Tom Doak, Robin Hiseman, Peter McEvoy, Don Placek and George Freeman. Latter BUDAs have been almost wholly populated by players rather than designers. How can we re-balance this mix? Should we?
5. Should we limit future "BUDAs" to the one event in the year, or should we have it co-existing with other mini-BUDAs, in the spirit of Chairman Mao who famously told us, "Let a thousand flowers bloom!"?
I say this in my current belief that:
6. BUDA 2010 should be at Pennard, and should be designed and organised whenever and however as Sean and others see fit. If it is built, I for one, will come.
7. Other mini-BUDAs, in Benelux and Dornoch and wherever, should also go ahead. My personal thoughts at this time are to help organise an event in Dornoch in mid-late May which will be in the spirit of BUDA but not necessarily in it's format. I see this as something which I will be involved in for the foreseeable future--same place, same time, every year. I will also support any other mini-BUDAs in Benelux or wherever.
Slainte
Rich