Bunkers short of 11 at LACC with boring edges vs bunkers short of LACC with thrilling edges = no difference in thrill of completing the task.
No?
http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/5176/rcdcomp.jpg
Of course not - the thrill of execution is the same. The strategy of the hole is the same. The punishment is no worse either on 11 at LACC or in your photoshopped creation whether the bunkers are jagged, blown out, or boring..and likewise the reward no greater. I have said all along, and you have known this about me in our past discussions - on my old analogy, was the thrill was robbed from the 18th at Pebble when they introduced the seawall?
I am a golfer first and foremost. I'd rather shoot 72 on the "old" LACC than shoot 78 on the "current" LACC, despite the improvements. I suspect you'd rather plod around the new course and soak in the bunkers as you go than shoot a low round on the old version...and that's fine for you, it's just not for me.
Again if you want to discuss what is PRETTIER, then you will get no argument from me. The bunkers on 11 as they appear now are WINDOW DRESSING. Not that there is anything wrong with window dressing, but to make it sound like the fundamental nature or strategy of the hole is being changed because someone wanted to get creative on the edges.
Change the turf conditions short of 11, introduce a viable run-up shot, and you've made it a better hole. Change the bunker edges and you've made it a prettier, more photogenic hole. Either way, I reiterate that I feel the exact same level of satisfaction if I am able to hit a good shot onto the green.